PreprintCited by 4Public Procurement and PolicyPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Governance

Procurement as Infrastructure

Open access
Davies, Nathan, Sanchez-Graells, Albert·2025·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.5297077

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The procurement process could be used to require suppliers to embed responsible AI aspects in their systems or development processes, for instance through requirements related to transparency, fairness, or community involvement.

    “That is, the procurement process could be used to require suppliers to embed responsible AI (rAI) aspects in their systems or development processes, for instance, through setting requirements related to transparency, fairness, or community involvement [9, 42, 55, 122].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, N., & Sanchez-Graells, A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Davies, Nathan
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411643146
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
Keywords
public procurement, infrastructure theory, socio-technical infrastructure, governance, state capacity, maintenance neglect, procurement law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review