AI Procurement Governance in Indonesian Customs: A Systematic Literature Review
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI could amplify existing challenges due to its technical complexity, increased autonomy, system opacity that impedes error detection, distributed responsibility across multiple suppliers and systems, and risks that propagate across linked systems and models.
“While some of the discussed risks may also apply for traditional IT systems [61], AI could amplify existing challenges due to its technical complexity, increased autonomy, system opacity that impedes error detection, distributed responsibility across multiple suppliers and systems, and risks that propagate across linked systems and models [88, 91].”
From “It’s Just a Wild, Wild West”: Harnessing Public Procurement as an AI Governance Mechanism (2026) · cites this paper as [88]
In Indonesia, AI procurement in customs was more complex than traditional IT but lacked tailored governance frameworks to enhance transparency and accountability.
“In Indonesia, AI procurement in customs was found to be more complex than traditional IT but lacked tailored governance frameworks to enhance transparency and accountability [88].”
From “It’s Just a Wild, Wild West”: Harnessing Public Procurement as an AI Governance Mechanism (2026) · cites this paper as [88]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“It’s Just a Wild, Wild West”: Harnessing Public Procurement as an AI Governance Mechanism
Hudig, A. I., Kallina, E., & Singh, J. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791968 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hasbullah, S.
- Corresponding author
- Hasbullah, Sasonoto
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4412984509
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Keywords
- customs administration, stakeholder coordination, trade facilitation, developing countries, customs modernization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
