Balancing Customer Engagement and Annoyance in Online Retail: Insights from a Field Experiment
Open accessAbstract
The emergence of e-commerce and digital operations has given firms unprecedented reach: retailers can now send real-time emails and mobile notifications to customers anywhere in the world. These direct-to-consumer promotions (e.g., coupons, emails, push alerts) can boost engagement and sales, but when overused, they can create annoyance and notification fatigue, alienate customers, increase unsubscriptions, and ultimately weaken long-term customer spending. In this paper, we first conduct a large-scale randomized field experiment at an online retailer to study this trade-off between engagement and annoyance. We find that sending fewer emails significantly reduces unsubscription (proxy for churn) by 59% and thus increases future customer survival, but at the cost of a 5-8% decrease in short-term revenue and purchase rate. These effects are heterogeneous: reducing coupon-email frequency lowers churn, especially among customers who previously used few coupons but opened many emails, and it reduces short-run spending, particularly among higher-volume customers and those who rarely opened emails. Then, using historical data over a longer time frame, we find that unsubscribing has a large negative effect on monthly revenue, with a 36% decrease in customer spending. We then embed these results in a customer lifetime-value (CLV) optimization model. The model shows that personalizing email frequency using the field-experimental estimates can improve long-term value: a myopic policy (maximizing immediate revenue) raises average CLV by 6.8%, while a full CLV-optimization policy yields an 8.3% gain over the daily-email baseline. These gains are driven by higher retention as well as modest changes in coupon usage. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of balancing short-term revenue with customer retention: sending emails with coupons too frequently can boost immediate sales but may "burn out" customers, whereas moderately reducing email frequency can yield higher lifetime value in many settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
The Impact of Customer Relationship Characteristics on Profitable Lifetime Duration
Reinartz, W., & Kumar, V. (2003) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.1.77.18589 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
A Customer Lifetime Value Framework for Customer Selection and Resource Allocation Strategy
Venkatesan, R., & Kumar, V. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.4.106.42728 · Cited by 948 · see citing works
RFM and CLV: Using Iso-Value Curves for Customer Base Analysis
Fader, P. S., Hardie, B. G. S., & Lee, K. L. (2005) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.415 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
The Role of the Management Sciences in Research on Personalization
Murthi, B. P. S., & Sarkar, S. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1344.17313 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Competitive One-to-One Promotions
Shaffer, G., & Zhang, Z. J. (2002) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.9.1143.172 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Mailing Decisions in the Catalog Sales Industry
Bitran, G. R., & Mondschein, S. (1996) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.9.1364 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Competitive Price Discrimination Strategies in a Vertical Channel Using Aggregate Retail Data
Besanko, D. A., Dubé, J., & Gupta, S. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.9.1121.16565 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Do Targeted Discount Offers Serve as Advertising? Evidence from 70 Field Experiments
Sahni, N. S., Zou, D., & Chintagunta, P. K. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2450 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Todri, V., Ghose, A., & Singh, P. V. (2020) · Information systems research · doi:10.1287/isre.2019.0877 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Liu, X. (2022) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2022.1403 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Do Coupons Expand or Cannibalize Revenue? Evidence from an e-Market
Reimers, I., & Xie, C. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2934 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
How Targeting Affects Customer Search: A Field Experiment
Fong, N. M. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2447 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
When Promotions Meet Operations: Cross-Selling and Its Effect on Call Center Performance
Armony, M., & Gurvich, I. (2009) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.1090.0281 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Scheduling Promotion Vehicles to Boost Profits
Baardman, L., Cohen, M. C., Panchamgam, K., Perakis, G., & Segev, D. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2926 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Detecting Customer Trends for Optimal Promotion Targeting
Baardman, L., Boroujeni, S. B., Cohen-Hillel, T., Panchamgam, K., & Perakis, G. (2020) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2020.0893 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Promotion Optimization for Multiple Items in Supermarkets
Cohen, M. C., Kalas, J. J., & Perakis, G. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3641 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Jagabathula, S., Mitrofanov, D., & Vulcano, G. J. (2022) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.2021.2108 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, Y., Lu, L. X., & Shi, P. (2022) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2022.1122 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Content Promotion for Online Content Platforms with the Diffusion Effect
Lin, Y., Wang, M., Zhang, H., et al. (2024) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2022.0172 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Dual Value of Delayed Incentives: An Empirical Investigation of Gift Card Promotions
Kadiyala, B., Özer, Ö., & Şimşek, A. S. (2024) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2022.0218 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Personalized Promotions in Practice: Dynamic Allocation and Reference Effects
Baek, J., Ma, W. W. K., & Mitrofanov, D. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.23781
Self-citationCustomers’ Multihoming Behavior in Ride-Hailing: Empirical Evidence from Uber and Lyft
Chitla, S., Cohen, M. C., Jagabathula, S., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4591826
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Aatif Awan, 2015, Less is more: You're about to receive less email from linkedin. LinkedIn Blog, 2025
- Alex Blumberg, 2018, The super-quick rise and even faster fall of groupon, Intelligencer (New York Magazine, 10
- Katie Collins, 2015, Linkedin promises to quit bugging you so much
- John Cook, 2014, Email delivery snafus cause headaches for zulily in q3, company cuts marketing spending as it works through issues, GeekWire, 2025
- Erick Schonfeld, 2011, Closing the redemption loop in local commerce, 2025
- Harrison Weber, 2013, Fab stops sending you emails you don't read, even when you don't ask them to. The Next Web, 2025
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Baek, J., Chen, D., Ma, W., & Mitrofanov, D.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Boston College (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mitrofanov, Dmitry
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7134928394
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- customer engagement, customer churn, customer retention, customer lifetime value, email personalization, online retail, push notifications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review