CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 46Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthEnvironmental Policies and Emissions

Stringency and Distribution in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme - The 2005 Evidence

Open access
Kettner, Claudia, Köppl, Angela, Schleicher, Stefan P., Thenius, Gregor·2007·SSRN Electronic Journal
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.968418
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

With the release of the verified emissions for installations covered by the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for the first trading year 2005 we are able to compare actual emissions and allowances for each installation. Based on data available for 24 Member States as of January 2007, this paper uses a thorough data analysis for about 9,900 installations to investigate evidence on three issues: first, the stringency of the total allocation cap and allocation differences both among the Member States and a selection of emission intensive sectors; second, the distribution of the size of installations; and third, the spread of allocation discrepancies and possible allocation biases regarding the size of installations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.968418

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kettner, C., Köppl, A., Schleicher, S. P., & Thenius, G.
Affiliations
  • Austrian Institute of Economic Research (AT)
  • University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Kettner, Claudia
ORCID
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.968418
OpenAlex
W2126117964
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Environmental Policies and Emissions
Keywords
EU Emissions Trading System, emission allowances, allowance allocation, allocation bias, climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review