Cited by 161Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies

Carbon Leakage With International Technology Spillovers

Open access
Gerlagh, Reyer, Kuik, Onno·2007·SSRN Electronic Journal

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.979915

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1]1. Acemoglu D. (1998) "Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality" in Quarterly journal of economics 113: 1055-1089.
  2. [2]2. Babiker, M. H. and Jacoby, H. D. (1999). Developing country effects of Kyoto-type emissions restrictions. Report No. 53, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Joint program on the Science and Policy of Global Change.
  3. [4]4. Babiker M.H. (2005) "Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage" in Journal of International Economics 65: 421-445.
  4. [5]5. Bayoumi T., D.T.Coe, and E.Helpman (1999) "R&D spillovers and global growth" in Journal of International Economics 47: 399-428.
  5. [7]7. Bollen, J., Manders, T., and Timmer, H. (2000). Decomposing carbon leakage. Third Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis. Melbourne, June 27-30 2000.
  6. [9]9. Burniaux, J.-M., McDougall, R., and Truong, T. P. (2002). An energy database for GTAP. In B. V. Dimaranan & R. McDougall (Eds.), Global trade, assistance and production: the GTAP 5 data base (Ch. 17, pp. 1-26). West Lafayette: GTAP, Purdue University.
  7. [11]11. Coe D.T. and E.Helpman (1995) "International R-And-D Spillovers" in European Economic Review 39: 859-887.
  8. [12]12. Comin D. and B.Hobijn (2004) "Cross-country technology adoption: making the theories face the facts" in Journal of Monetary Economics 51: 39-83.
  9. [13]13. Copeland B.R. and M.S. Taylor (2003) Trade and the environment , Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
  10. [17]17. Felder S. and T.F. Rutherford (1993) "Unilateral CO2 Reductions and Carbon Leakage: The Consequences of International Trade in Oil and Basic Materials" in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25: 162-176.
  11. [19]19. Grossman, G. M., and Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER paper 3914, Cambridge, MA.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  12. [22]22. Kuik O.J. and R.Gerlagh (2003) "Trade Liberalization and Carbon Leakage" The Energy Journal 24: 97-120.
  13. [25]25. McKibbin, W.J., Ross, M.T., Shackleton, R., and Wilcoxen, P.J. (1999). Emissions trading, capital flows and the Kyoto Protocol. The Energy Journal (special issue on the Kyoto Protocol), 287-333.
  14. [26]26. Nordhaus W.D. (2002) "Modeling induced innovation in climate-change policy" in Modeling induced innovation in climate-change policy, Ch. 9, edited by A.Grübler, N.Nakicenovic, and W.D.Nordhaus. Resources for the Future Press, Washington.
  15. [27]27. Paltsev, S.V. (2001). The Kyoto Protocol: regional and sectoral contributions to the carbon leakage. The Energy Journal , 22, 53-79.
  16. [28]28. Popp, D. (2002). Induced innovation and energy prices, American Economic Review 92: 160180.
  17. [29]29. Rosendahl K.E. (2004) "Cost-effective environmental policy: implications of induced technological change" in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48 : 10991121.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerlagh, R., & Kuik, O.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123989014
Cited by
161
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Keywords
carbon leakage, international technology spillovers, pollution haven hypothesis, carbon pricing, climate policy, computable general equilibrium model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review