Cited by 175Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthEconomic theories and models

CARBON LEAKAGE, THE GREEN PARADOX, AND PERFECT FUTURE MARKETS*

Open access
Eichner, Thomas, Pethig, Rüdiger·2011·International Economic Review

Abstract

Policies of lowering carbon demand may aggravate instead of alleviate climate change (green paradox). In a two-period, three-country general equilibrium model with finite endowment of fossil fuel, one country enforces an emissions cap in the first or second periods. When that cap is tightened, the extent of carbon leakage depends on the interaction of various parameters and elasticities. Conditions for the green paradox are specified. All determinants of carbon leakage resulting from tightening the first-period cap work in the opposite direction when the second-period cap is tightened. Tightening the second-period cap does not necessarily lead to the green paradox.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2011.00649.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bohm, P. (1993), 'Incomplete international cooperation to reduce CO 2 emissions: alter- native policies', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24, 258-271.
  2. Ishikawa, J. and K. Kiyono (2006), 'Greenhouse-gas emissions controls in an open econ- omy', International Economic Review 47, 431-450.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eichner, T., & Pethig, R.
Affiliations
FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
Corresponding author
Pethig, Rüdiger
Venue
International Economic Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
767-805
ISSN
0020-6598 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123704000
Cited by
175
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
41.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
Keywords
carbon leakage, green paradox, emission caps, climate policy, carbon demand, three-country model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review