Cited by 92Geometric and Algebraic TopologyNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology

Classical 6j-symbols and the tetrahedron

Open access
Roberts, Justin·1999·Geometry & Topology

Abstract

A classical 6j -symbol is a real number which can be associated to a labelling of the six edges of a tetrahedron by irreducible representations of SU (2).This abstract association is traditionally used simply to express the symmetry of the 6j -symbol, which is a purely algebraic object; however, it has a deeper geometric significance.Ponzano and Regge, expanding on work of Wigner, gave a striking (but unproved) asymptotic formula relating the value of the 6jsymbol, when the dimensions of the representations are large, to the volume of an honest Euclidean tetrahedron whose edge lengths are these dimensions.The goal of this paper is to prove and explain this formula by using geometric quantization.A surprising spin-off is that a generic Euclidean tetrahedron gives rise to a family of twelve scissors-congruent but non-congruent tetrahedra.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2140/gt.1999.3.21

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the limit of large j, the 6j-symbol times a phase is asymptotic to a sum of two exponentials involving the Regge action and volume, as in Equation (66).

    “Ponzano and Regge noticed, and Roberts later proved rigorously [234], that in the limit of large j,”

    From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [234]

    Theorem 1 (Introduction) rigorously gives a large-label asymptotic formula with a volume-dependent amplitude and a cosine of the dihedral-angle phase; the cosine can be written as a sum of two exponentials. But the theorem gives that oscillatory formula only for an admissibly labelled Euclidean tetrahedron. It instead states exponential decay for the Minkowskian case, a condition the claim omits. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. R Carter, G Segal, I MacDonald, Lectures on Lie groups and Lie algebras, LMS Student Texts 32, Cambridge University Press (1995)
  2. W Fulton, J Harris, Representation theory, Springer GTM 129 (1991)
  3. A A Kirillov, Geometric quantization, from: "Dynamical systems IV", Ency- clopaedia of Mathematical Sciences 4 (V I Arnol'd and S P Novikov, editors) Springer (1990)
  4. D A Klain, G-C Rota, Introduction to geometric probability, Cambridge Uni- versity Press (1997)
  5. D McDuff, D Salamon, Introduction to symplectic topology, Oxford Univer- sity Press (1995)
  6. J Milnor, Euler characteristic and finitely additive Steiner measures, from: "Collected papers vol. 1", Publish or Perish (1993)
  7. J Milnor, The Schläfli differential equality, from: "Collected papers vol. 1", Publish or Perish (1993)
  8. D Mumford, J Fogerty, F C Kirwan, Geometric invariant theory, Ergeb- nisse der Mathematik 34, Springer (1994)
  9. D A Varshalovich, A N Moskalev, V K Khersonskii, Quantum theory of angular momentum: irreducible tensors, spherical harmonics, vector coupling coefficients, 3nj -symbols, World Scientific (1988)
  10. N Y Vilenkin, A U Klimyk, Representation of Lie groups, and special func- tions, vol. 1, Kluwer (1991)
  11. E Wigner, Group theory, Academic Press (1959)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, J.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Justin
Venue
Geometry & Topology
Published
1999-03-22
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
21-66
ISSN
  • 1364-0380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3060
OpenAlex
W2115190755
Cited by
92
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geometry & Topology (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Keywords
6j symbols, tetrahedron, SU(2) representations, asymptotic formula, geometric quantization, scissors congruence, irreducible representations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review