The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimal paths for a car that goes both forwards and backwards
Open accessAbstract
The path taken by a car with a given minimum turning radius has a lower bound on its radius of curvature at each point, but the path has cusps if the car shifts into or out of reverse gear.What is the shortest such path a car can travel between two points if its starting and ending directions are specified?One need consider only paths with at most 2 cusps or reversals.We give a set of paths which is sufficient in the sense that it always contains a shortest path and small in the sense that there are at most 68, but usually many fewer paths in the set for any pair of endpoints and directions.We give these paths by explicit formula.Calculating the length of each of these paths and selecting the (not necessarily unique) path with smallest length yields a simple algorithm for a shortest path in each case.These optimal paths or geodesies may be described as follows: If C is an arc of a circle of the minimal turning radius and S is a line segment, then it is sufficient to consider only certain paths of the form CCSCC where arcs and segments fit smoothly, one or more of the arcs or segments may vanish, and where reversals, or equivalently cusps, between arcs or segments are allowed.This contrasts with the case when cusps are not allowed, where Dubins (1957) has shown that paths of the form CCC and CSC suffice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Randomized Kinodynamic Planning
LaValle, S. M., & Kuffner, J. J. (2001) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/02783640122067453 · Cited by 3,254
A Review of Motion Planning Techniques for Automated Vehicles
Gonzalez, D., Perez, J., Milanes, V., & Nashashibi, F. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2015.2498841 · Cited by 1,670
Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles
Pendleton, S., Andersen, H., Du, X., Shen, X., Meghjani, M., Eng, Y., Rus, D., & Ang, M. (2017) · Machines · doi:10.3390/machines5010006 · Cited by 657
Stable Pushing: Mechanics, Controllability, and Planning
Lynch, K. M., & Mason, M. T. (1996) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/027836499601500602 · Cited by 463
CommonRoad: Composable benchmarks for motion planning on roads
Althoff, M., Koschi, M., & Manzinger, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) · doi:10.1109/ivs.2017.7995802 · Cited by 443
Metadata
- Authors
- Reeds, J., & Shepp, L.
- Venue
- Pacific Journal of Mathematics
- Publisher
- Mathematical Sciences Publishers
- Published
- 1990-10-01
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 367-393
- ISSN
- 0030-8730 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971998222
- Cited by
- 1,447
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal paths for a car that goes both forwards and backwards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2140/pjm.1990.145.367
- The paper
- Reeds, J., & Shepp, L. (1990). Optimal paths for a car that goes both forwards and backwards. Pacific Journal of Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1990.145.367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.