Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 465Robot Manipulation and LearningRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stable Pushing: Mechanics, Controllability, and Planning

Lynch, Kevin M., Mason, Matthew T.·1996·The International Journal of Robotics Research

Abstract

We would like to give robots the ability to position and orient parts in the plane by pushing, particularly when the parts are too large or heavy to be grasped and lifted. Unfortunately, the motion of a pushed object is generally unpredictable due to unknown support friction forces. With multiple pushing contact points, however, it is possible to find pushing directions that cause the object to remain fixed to the manipulator. These are called stable pushing directions. In this article we consider the problem of planning pushing paths using stable pushes. Pushing imposes a set of nonholonomic velocity constraints on the motion of the object, and we study the issues of local and global controllability during pushing with point contact or stable line contact. We describe a planner for finding stable pushing paths among obstacles, and the planner is demon strated on several manipulation tasks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/027836499601500602

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Abell, T., Proc. 1995 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems
  2. Aiyama, Y., Proc. 1993 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems
  3. Akella, S., Proc. 1992 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  4. Arai, H., Proc. 1994 Japan-USA Symp. on Flexible Automation
  5. Balorda, Z., Proc. 1990 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  6. Balorda, Z., Proc. 1993 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  7. Brokowski, M., Proc. 1993 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  8. Brost, R.C., Proc. 1992 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  9. Dacre-Wright, B., Proc. 1992 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  10. Donald, B.R., Jennings, J., and Rus, D. 1993. Information invariants for cooperating autonomous mobile robots. Sixth Int. Symp. Robotics Res. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 29-48.
  11. Gandolfo, F., Proc. 1991 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems
  12. Grünbaum, B., 1967, Convex Polytopes
  13. Higuchi, T. 1985. Application of electromagnetic impulsive force to precise positioning tools in robot systems. Second Int. Symp. Robotics Res. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 281-285.
  14. Hong, J., Proc. 1990 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  15. Huang, W., Proc. 1995 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  16. Jacobs, P., Proc. 1989 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  17. Koga, Y., Proc. 1994 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  18. Kurisu, M., Proc. 1994 Japan-USA Symp. on Flexible Automation
  19. Laumond, J.-P., Proc. 1986 Int. Conf. Intelligent Autonomous Systems
  20. Lynch, K.M., Proc. 1992 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  21. Lynch, K.M., Proc. 1993 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems
  22. Lynch, K.M., Proc. 1992 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems
  23. Lynch, K.M., Proc. 1996 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems
  24. Mani, M., North American Manufacturing Research Institute Conference XIII
  25. Mason, M.T., Proc. 1989 Int. Symp. Experimental Robotics
  26. Mason, M.T., Sixth Symp. on Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators
  27. Mason, M.T., Proc. 1993 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems
  28. Mayeda, H., Proc. 1991 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems
  29. Narasimhan, S., 1995, Task-level strategies for robot tasks. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering
  30. Okawa, Y., Proc. 1992 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  31. Rizzi, A.A., Proc. 1993 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  32. Salganicoff, M., Proc. 1993 Int. Conf. Advanced Robotics
  33. Salganicoff, M., 1993, Vision
  34. Sawasaki, N., 20th Int. Symp. Industrial Robots and Robot Exhibition
  35. Schaal, S., Proc. 1993 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  36. Trinkle, J.C., Proc. 1993 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation
  37. Wilfong, G., Proc. 4th ACM Symp. Computational Geometry
  38. Yoshikawa, T., Proc. 1991 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems
  39. Zrimec, T., 1990, Towards autonomous learning of behavior by a robot. Ph.D. thesis
  40. Zumel, N.B., Proc. 1994 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation

Cited by

See all 465

Metadata

Authors
Lynch, K. M., & Mason, M. T.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
The International Journal of Robotics Research
Published
1996-12
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
533-556
ISSN
  • 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3176
OpenAlex
W2098030884
Cited by
463
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
14.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
The International Journal of Robotics Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Keywords
controllability, line contact, point contacts, object manipulation, motion planning, obstacle avoidance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stable Pushing: Mechanics, Controllability, and Planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/027836499601500602
The paper
Lynch, K. M., & Mason, M. T. (1996). Stable Pushing: Mechanics, Controllability, and Planning. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836499601500602

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.