Cited by 24Marine and coastal plant biologySeaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsMarine and fisheries research

Environmental factors and commercial harvesting: exploring possible links behind the decline of the kelp Laminaria digitata in Brittany, France

Open access
DAVOULT, Dominique, ENGEL, Carolyn R., ARZEL, Pierre, KNOCH, Danylas, LAURANS, Martial·2011·Station Biologique de Roscoff (SBR)

Abstract

Over the last decade, the commercially harvested quantities of the kelp Laminaria digitata have decreased along the coast of Brittany, falling from an annual production of around 60,000 t to the current production of 50,000 t Environmental parameters and the intensity of harvesting are the main potential sources of this decline. To analyse the impact of the environment, several environmental factors such as temperature, light intensity and storm intensity were included in multivariate analyses to explore their potential effects on standing stock variables (density and biomass of L. digitata populations in north Finistère). Results show relatively limited temporal fluctuations in biomass and density, although density has generally increased since 2000. Biomass appeared to follow a periodic cycle of 12 years, but could not be linked to any environmental factor. Temperature seemed to have the largest effect (negative when it increases), although this effect was masked during the last years of the study period. Analyses on harvest data revealed that the lower landings of L. digitata were not correlated to a decrease in the available algal stock but to insufficient harvesting effort. This may be due to a decrease in the number of days spent harvesting kelp and in the number of kelp-harvesting vessels. While the production per vessel has increased since 2000, this increase was insufficient to increase or even maintain total production.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.21411/cbm.a.52a7b30e

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Management plans for L. digitata are established according to available annual biomass and regulate the number of vessels by harvesting area, the starting period of the harvesting season and the number of harvesting days per week.

    “These plans are established in accordance to the available annual biomass and regulate the number of vessels by harvesting area, the starting period of the harvesting season and the number of harvesting days per week.”
  • Laminaria digitata is traditionally harvested from May to September following quotas established by management plans.

    “Laminaria digitata is traditionally harvested from May to September following quotas established by management plans.”
  • In Brittany, kelp species harvesting is traditionally carried out by a fleet of small vessels operating seasonally.

    “In Brittany, the most critical seaweed production region in France ( Figure 3A ), kelp species harvesting is traditionally carried out by a fleet of small vessels operating seasonally.”
  • L. hyperborea areas are harvested between the beginning of September and mid-May, but autumn biomass removals represent 75 to 80% of the total annual volume of harvested algae biomass.

    “These areas are harvested between the beginning of September and mid-May, but the autumn biomass removals represent 75 to 80% of the total annual volume of harvested algae biomass.”
  • Harvesting of L. hyperborea is managed by quotas established for areas which open every 3 years.

    “Similarly, the harvesting of L. hyperborea is also managed by quotas established for areas which open every 3 years.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DAVOULT, D., ENGEL, C. R., ARZEL, P., KNOCH, D., & LAURANS, M.
Affiliations
Laboratoire d'Ecogéochimie des Environnements Benthiques (FR)
Venue
Station Biologique de Roscoff (SBR)
Publisher
Station Biologique de Roscoff (SBR)
Published
2011
Volume
52
Issue
4, SI
Pages
429-434
OpenAlex
W2900290681
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cahiers de biologie marine
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
Laminaria digitata, kelp decline, seaweed harvesting, commercial landings, environmental factors, sea surface temperature, light intensity, storm intensity, kelp biomass, population density, harvesting effort, Finistère, Brittany

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review