The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Seaweeds Fisheries Management in France, Japan, Chile and Norway
Open accessAbstract
Coastal communities have long gathered seaweeds for their own consumption, for animal feed and for fertilizer. The development of industrial use and trade of seaweeds generated income to local communities. The intensification of the exploitation led local communities to implement rules to regulate harvesting. This paper analyses the evolution of seaweed management regimes in four countries: France, Japan, Chile and Norway. Social justice within the communities and equity among gatherers appear to be the basic principles to these rules. Conflict avoidance is their concern much more than resource conservation. This review highlights the role played by fishers' organisations and the processing industries in the management of seaweeds.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The species collected by each harvesting method differ with only a few species being harvested mechanically (Frangoudes, 2011; Rebours et al., 2014).”
From Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as Frangoudes, 2011
In the citing paper
“Laminaria digitata is traditionally harvested from May to September following quotas established by management plans.”
From Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as Frangoudes, 2011
In the citing paper
“In Brittany, the most critical seaweed production region in France ( Figure 3A ), kelp species harvesting is traditionally carried out by a fleet of small vessels operating seasonally.”
From Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as Frangoudes, 2011
In the citing paper
“These plans are established in accordance to the available annual biomass and regulate the number of vessels by harvesting area, the starting period of the harvesting season and the number of harvesting days per week.”
From Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as Frangoudes, 2011
In the citing paper
“These areas are harvested between the beginning of September and mid-May, but the autumn biomass removals represent 75 to 80% of the total annual volume of harvested algae biomass.”
From Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as Frangoudes, 2011
In the citing paper
“Strict management plans for harvested resources are frequently put in place by the regional authorities, harvesters' associations or harvesting companies (García Tasende and Rodríguez González, 2003; Frangoudes, 2011).”
From Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as Frangoudes, 2011
In the citing paper
“Similarly, the harvesting of L. hyperborea is also managed by quotas established for areas which open every 3 years.”
From Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as Frangoudes, 2011
In the citing paper
“Ascophyllum nodosum is harvested in Europe at an annual rate of approximately 0.1 Mt (FW) per year ( Figure 8 ), being one of the main species traditionally collected in countries like Ireland, Iceland, and Norway (Frangoudes, 2011; Mac Monagail and Morrison, 2020) and, to a lesser extent, in France.”
From Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as Frangoudes, 2011
In the citing paper
“L. digitata is the main exploited species in France where it is collected seasonally (Alban et al., 2011; Davoult et al., 2011), while L. hyperborea is the main species exploited in areas such as Norway where it is harvested all year-round (Frangoudes, 2011; Vea and Ask, 2011).”
From Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as Frangoudes, 2011
In the citing paper
“Laminaria hyperborea biomass in Europe is mainly allocated to the production of extracts used for alginates, supplying 25% of the world alginates manufacturing (Frangoudes, 2011; Rebours et al., 2014; Stévant et al., 2017).”
From Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as Frangoudes, 2011
In the citing paper
“Species such as A. nodosum are also extensively used as feed ingredients for livestock and pets (Frangoudes, 2011; Holdt and Kraan, 2011).”
From Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as Frangoudes, 2011
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy
Araújo, R., Vázquez Calderón, F., Sánchez López, J., Azevedo, I. C., Bruhn, A., Fluch, S., Garcia Tasende, M., Ghaderiardakani, F., Ilmjärv, T., Laurans, M., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.626389 · Cited by 653
Metadata
- Authors
- FRANGOUDES, K.
- Venue
- Station Biologique de Roscoff (SBR)
- Publisher
- Station Biologique de Roscoff (SBR)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 517-525
- OpenAlex
- W3213174787
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
- Cahiers de biologie marine
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal Fisheries and Human Impacts
- Keywords
- coastal communities, social justice, conflict avoidance, resource conservation, France, Japan, Chile, Norway
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seaweeds Fisheries Management in France, Japan, Chile and Norway. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21411/cbm.a.adb62ec3
- The paper
- FRANGOUDES, K. (2011). Seaweeds Fisheries Management in France, Japan, Chile and Norway. Station Biologique de Roscoff (SBR). https://doi.org/10.21411/cbm.a.adb62ec3
