CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesHigher Education Practises and Engagement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Delegating Mathematical Authority as a Means to Strive Toward Equity

Open access
Dunleavy, Teresa K.·2015·Journal of Urban Mathematics Education
DOI 10.21423/jume-v8i1a242
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this article, the author provides insight into the pedagogical processes for delegating mathematical authority to students, through the use of specific classroom structures, as a means to strive toward equity. Employing qualitative methods, the author analyzes transcripts of classroom video, along with field notes and teacher and student interviews, collected during one semester of the participating teacher's Algebra I course. The author addresses how the teacher's practice was striving toward equity through the use of classroom structures that delegated mathematical authority to students. Analyses revealed that the teacher delegated mathematical authority through the use of student presentations, Shuffle Quizzes, and Participation Quizzes. Each instance featured was chosen to highlight a different facet of the ways in which delegating authority repositioned students as competent sense-makers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21423/jume-v8i1a242

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Boaler, J. (2006). Promoting 'relational equity' and high school mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167-194.
  2. Dunleavy Delegating Mathematical Authority Journal of Urban Mathematics Education Vol. 8, No. 1
  3. Cohen, E. (1997a). Equity in heterogeneous classrooms: A challenge for teachers and sociologists. In E. G. Cohen & R. A. Lotan (Eds.), Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Socio- logical theory in practice (pp. 3-14). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  4. Cohen, E. (1997b). Understanding status problems: Sources and consequences. In E. G. Cohen & R. A. Lotan (Eds.), Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice (pp. 77-91). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  5. Cohen, E., & Lotan, R. (Eds.). (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  6. Ehrlich, D. E., & Zack, M. B. (1997). The power in playing the part. In E. G. Cohen & R. A. Lotan (Eds.), Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice (pp. 44-57). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  7. Gutiérrez, R. (2007). (Re)defining equity: The importance of a critical perspective. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 37-50). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  8. Hand, V. (2003). Reframing participation: How mathematics classrooms afford opportunities for mathematical activity that is meaningful to students from diverse social and cultural back- grounds (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  9. Jilk, L. M. (2007). Translated mathematical: Immigrant women's use of salient identities as cultural tools for interpretation and learning (Doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
  10. Lotan, R. A. (1997). Complex instruction: An overview. In E. G. Cohen & R. A. Lotan (Eds.), Work- ing for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice (pp. 15-27). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  11. Nasir, N. S., & Cobb, P. (Eds.). (2007). Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  12. Dunleavy Delegating Mathematical Authority Journal of Urban Mathematics Education Vol. 8, No. 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 48

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dunleavy, T. K.
Affiliations
University of San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Dunleavy, Teresa K.
Venue
Journal of Urban Mathematics Education
Publisher
Texas A&M University Libraries
Published
2015-07-30
Volume
8
Issue
1
ISSN
2151-2612 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.21423/jume-v8i1a242
OpenAlex
W1836201742
Cited by
45
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Urban Mathematics Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Texas A&M University Libraries
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
equity in mathematics education, student presentations, classroom structure, Algebra I, sensemaking, student competencies, teacher practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review