Cited by 61Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare StudiesFreedom of Expression and Defamation

Access Contested: Security, Identity, and Resistance in Asian Cyberspace

Open access
Deibert, Ronald, Palfrey, John, Rohozinski, Rafal, Zittrain, Jonathan L.·2011·CrimRxiv

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21428/cb6ab371.4d5188e5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kenya's 2018 Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act introduces a vague definition of cyber harassment, which could result in long prison terms for relatively minor offenses.

    “The act also introduces a vague definition of cyber harassment, which could result in long prison terms for relatively minor offenses.109”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deibert, R., Palfrey, J., Rohozinski, R., & Zittrain, J. L.
Venue
CrimRxiv
Publisher
PubPub
Published
2011-09-01
OpenAlex
W4236617601
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • CrimRxiv (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Keywords
cyberspace, digital security, identity, resistance, online access

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review