Cited by 57Artificial Intelligence in EducationDigital Education and SocietyArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Generative AI and Creative Learning: Concerns, Opportunities, and Choices

Open access
Resnick, Mitchel·2024·An MIT Exploration of Generative AI

Abstract

As each new wave of technology ripples through society, we need to decide if and how to integrate the technology into our learning environments. That was true with personal computers, then with the internet, and now with generative AI technologies. For each new technology, there are many different ways that we can integrate the technology into how we teach and learn. These choices are critically important: different choices can have very different outcomes and implications.How should we make these choices? I think we need to decide what type of learning and education we want for our children, our schools, and our society—and then design new technologies and applications that align with our educational values and visions.What does that mean for the integration of new generative AI technologies such as ChatGPT into our learning environments?Â

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21428/e4baedd9.cf3e35e5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GenAI broadens forms of expression, strengthens creativity, and supports higher-order and critical thinking.

    “which broadens forms of expression, strengthens creativity [4,5], and supports higher-order and critical thinking [6,7].”

    From A Systematic Review of Generative AI in K–12: Mapping Goals, Activities, Roles, and Outcomes via the 3P Model (2025) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Opportunities section says generative AI has the potential to support creative learning and help young people develop creativity, but only if it is designed and used intentionally. Supporting the Creative Learning Process gives an example of AI tools for expressing cultural identity. These passages support possible creative and expressive benefits, not the unqualified claim that GenAI already broadens expression and strengthens creativity; the separate thinking claim is attached to [6,7]. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Resnick, M.
Affiliations
MIT Media Lab (US)
Corresponding author
Resnick, Mitchel
Venue
An MIT Exploration of Generative AI
Publisher
PubPub
Published
2024-03-27
OpenAlex
W4393229395
Cited by
50
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 11
FWCI
18.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
generative AI, creative learning, ChatGPT, technology integration in education, educational values, educational vision, learning environment, generative AI in teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review