Cited by 33Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Electrocardiographic differentiation of common type atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia via a concealed accessory pathway

K.P. Letsas, R. Weber, C. Herrera Siklódy, C.C. Mihas, J. Stockinger, T. Blum, D. Kalusche, T. Arentz·2010·Acta Cardiologica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of specific ECG markers in the differentiation of common type atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) via a concealed accessory pathway. METHODS: One hundred and ten ECGs with paroxysmal narrow QRS complex, short RP tachycardia were evaluated. Subjects with overt ventricular pre-excitation during sinus rhythm were excluded from the study. The mechanism of arrhythmia was established during the electrophysiological study and confirmed by the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation. RESULTS: Of the 110 patients, 74 displayed common type AVNRT and 36 AVRT. Predictors of AVNRT were the presence of pseudo r'-waves in lead V1 [sensitivity 39.19%; specificity 97.14%; positive predictive value (PPV) 96.67%; negative predictive value (NPV) 43.04%] and pseudo S-waves in inferior leads (sensitivity 28.38%; specificity 94.29%; PPV 91.30%; NPV 38.37%). In the setting of visible P-waves, an RP interval < or =90 ms favoured the diagnosis of AVNRT (sensitivity 57.14%; specificity 80.65%). Predictors of AVRT were QRS alternans (sensitivity 50%; specificity 89.19%; PPV 69.23%; NPV 78.57%) as well as ST-segment alterations during tachycardia. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of ST-segment depression for discriminating AVRT from AVNRT were 97.22%, 58.11%, 53.03%, 97.73%, respectively. Similarly, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of ST-segment elevation in lead aVR were 94.44%, 58.11%, 52.31%, and 95.56%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that ST-segment depression [(odds ratio (OR): 12.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.77-90.81, P = 0.011)] and QRS alternans (OR: 9.43, 95% CI: 1.38-64.37, P = 0.022) displayed the highest predictive ability favouring the diagnosis of AVRT. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-lead ECG parameters may help to differentiate the mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia prior to the ablation procedure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2143/ac.65.2.2047050

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Letsas, K. P., Weber, R., Siklódy, C. H., Mihas, C. C., Stockinger, J., Blum, T., Kalusche, D., & Arentz, T.
Venue
Acta Cardiologica
Published
2010-04-30
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
171-176
ISSN
0001-5385 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024900917
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Cardiologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia, concealed accessory pathway, electrocardiographic markers, ST-segment depression, ST-segment elevation, QRS alternans
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Diagnosis, Differential, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Conduction System, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Catheter Ablation, Tachycardia, Reciprocating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review