The Median 'Empire', the End of Urartu and Cyrus the Great's Campaign in 547 BC
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Persian army crossed the Tigris below Arbela in 547 BC (Nisannu/April 547 BC), during the 9th year of Nabonidus, at the start of Cyrus's campaign against Urartu or Lydia.
“Latest from the start of the campaign led by Cyrus whether against Urartu or Lydia (Rollinger 2008;Rollinger and Kellner 2019) in 547 BC (Nisannu/April 547 BC), during the 9 th year of Nabonidus the Persian army crossed the Tigris below Arbela”
From Tracing Regime Change during the Transition from the Neo-Babylonian to the Achaemenid Empire at Nippur: Reconstruction of Archives Excavated in 1889 (2023) · cites this paper as Rollinger 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schneider, B. (2023) · Asia Anteriore Antica. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Cultures · doi:10.36253/asiana-1576 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- ROLLINGER, R.
- Corresponding author
- ROLLINGER, Robert
- ORCID
- ROLLINGER, Robert
- Venue
- Ancient West & East
- Publisher
- Peeters Publishers
- Published
- 2008-12-31
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 51-65
- ISSN
- 1783-8363 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975829252
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ancient West & East (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Eurasian Exchange Networks
- Keywords
- Median Empire, Urartu, Cyrus the Great, ancient Near East
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
