The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Let's go public! taking a spoken dialog system to the real world
Abstract
In this paper, we describe how a research spoken dialog system was made available to the general public. The Let’s Go Public spoken dialog system provides bus schedule information to the Pittsburgh population during off-peak times. This paper describes the changes necessary to make the system usable for the general public and presents analysis of the calls and strategies we have used to ensure high performance. 1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploring human error recovery strategies: Implications for spoken dialogue systems
Skantze, G. (2005) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2004.11.005 · Cited by 137
Analysis of user behavior under error conditions in spoken dialogs
Shin, J., Narayanan, S. S., Gerber, L., Kazemzadeh, A., & Byrd, D. (2002) · 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2002) · doi:10.21437/icslp.2002-567 · Cited by 54 · cited 1×
“To better understand what happens when the user is faced with a non-understanding, we defined a labeling scheme based on the one proposed by Shin et al [9] to describe user responses to sys-tem prompts.”
Method
Cited by
MultiWOZ - A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modelling
Budzianowski, P., Wen, T.-H., Tseng, B.-H., Casanueva, I., Ultes, S., Ramadan, O., & Gašić, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1547 · Cited by 1,028
From Eliza to XiaoIce: Challenges and opportunities with social chatbots
Shum, H.-Y., He, X.-D., & Li, D. (2018) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.1700826 · Cited by 749
Zhao, T., Zhao, R., & Eskenazi, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1061 · Cited by 736
Self-citationThe Second Dialog State Tracking Challenge
Henderson, M., Thomson, B., & Williams, J. D. (2014) · Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL) · doi:10.18653/v1/w14-4337 · Cited by 538
Liu, B., Tür, G., Hakkani-Tür, D., Shah, P., & Heck, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1187 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Raux, A., Langner, B., Bohus, D., Black, A. W., & Eskenazi, M.
- Venue
- Interspeech 2005
- Publisher
- ISCA
- Published
- 2005-09-04
- Pages
- 885-888
- ISSN
- 2308-457X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W178897730
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Let's go public! taking a spoken dialog system to the real world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21437/interspeech.2005-399
- The paper
- Raux, A., Langner, B., Bohus, D., Black, A. W., & Eskenazi, M. (2005). Let's go public! taking a spoken dialog system to the real world. Interspeech 2005. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2005-399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.