The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ASVspoof 2017 Challenge: Assessing the Limits of Replay Spoofing Attack Detection
Open accessAbstract
The ASVspoof initiative was created to promote the development of countermeasures which aim to protect automatic speaker verification (ASV) from spoofing attacks. The first community-led, common evaluation held in 2015 focused on countermeasures for speech synthesis and voice conversion spoofing attacks. Arguably, however, it is replay attacks which pose the greatest threat. Such attacks involve the replay of recordings collected from enrolled speakers in order to provoke false alarms and can be mounted with greater ease using everyday consumer devices. ASVspoof 2017, the second in the series, hence focused on the development of replay attack countermeasures. This paper describes the database, protocols and initial findings. The evaluation entailed highly heterogeneous acoustic recording and replay conditions which increased the equal error rate (EER) of a baseline ASV system from 1.76% to 30.71%. Submissions were received from 49 research teams, 20 of which improved upon a baseline replay spoofing detector EER of 24.65%, in terms of replay/non-replay discrimination. While largely successful, the evaluation indicates that the quest for countermeasures which are resilient in the face of variable replay attacks remains very much alive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, before the ASVspoof Challenge 2017 (Kinnunen et al., 2017; Lavrentyeva et al., 2017), there were only a couple of research papers done on replay attack, and after this challenge, more approaches for this attack were researched (Tom et al., 2018; Pradhan et al., 2019).”
From Audio deepfakes: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as Kinnunen et al., 2017
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Speaker Verification Using Adapted Gaussian Mixture Models
Reynolds, D. A., Quatieri, T. F., & Dunn, R. B. (2000) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1006/dspr.1999.0361 · Cited by 4,282
Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models
Reynolds, D. A., & Rose, R. C. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · doi:10.1109/89.365379 · Cited by 2,860
An overview of text-independent speaker recognition: From features to supervectors
Kinnunen, T., & Li, H. (2009) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2009.08.009 · Cited by 1,451
Self-citationCalculation of a constant Q spectral transform
Brown, J. T. (1991) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.400476 · Cited by 925
Speaker Recognition by Machines and Humans: A tutorial review
Hansen, J. H. L., & Hasan, T. (2015) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2015.2462851 · Cited by 652
Spoofing and countermeasures for speaker verification: A survey
Wu, Z., Evans, N., Kinnunen, T., Yamagishi, J., Alegre, F., & Li, H. (2015) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2014.10.005 · Cited by 601
Self-citationASVspoof 2015: the first automatic speaker verification spoofing and countermeasures challenge
Wu, Z., Kinnunen, T., Evans, N., Yamagishi, J., Hanilçi, C., Sahidullah, M., & Sizov, A. (2015) · Interspeech 2015 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2015-462 · Cited by 484 · cited 1×
“ASVspoof 2017 follows two special sessions on spoofing and countermeasures for automatic speaker verification at INTERSPEECH 2013 [13] and 2015 [14] which formed the first evaluation, ASVspoof 2015 [15].”
BackgroundSelf-citationConstant Q Cepstral Coefficients: A Spoofing Countermeasure for Automatic Speaker Verification
Todisco, M., Delgado, H., & Evans, N. (2017) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2017.01.001 · Cited by 424
Self-citationA New Feature for Automatic Speaker Verification Anti-Spoofing: Constant Q Cepstral Coefficients
Todisco, M., Delgado, H., & Evans, N. (2016) · The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop (Odyssey) · doi:10.21437/odyssey.2016-41 · Cited by 340
Self-citationText-dependent speaker verification: Classifiers, databases and RSR2015
Larcher, A., Lee, K. A., Ma, B., & Li, H. (2014) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2014.03.001 · Cited by 239
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 536
Low-quality Fake Audio Detection through Frequency Feature Masking
Kwak, I., Choi, S., Yang, J., Lee, Y., Han, S., & Oh, S. (2022) · doi:10.1145/3552466.3556533 · Cited by 12
DeepDet: YAMNet with BottleNeck Attention Module (BAM) for TTS synthesis detection
Mahum, R., Irtaza, A., Javed, A., Mahmoud, H. A., & Hassan, H. (2024) · EURASIP Journal on Audio Speech and Music Processing · doi:10.1186/s13636-024-00335-9 · Cited by 17
A Cross-Database Study of Voice Presentation Attack Detection
Korshunov, P., & Marcel, S. (2019) · Advances in computer vision and pattern recognition · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92627-8_16 · Cited by 12
Attention-Based LSTM Algorithm for Audio Replay Detection in Noisy Environments
Li, J., Zhang, X., Sun, M., Zou, X., & Zheng, C. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9081539 · Cited by 12
Rostami, A. M., Homayounpour, M. M., & Nickabadi, A. (2023) · Circuits Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1007/s00034-023-02314-5 · Cited by 15
MetaEar: Imperceptible Acoustic Side Channel Continuous Authentication Based on ERTF
Chang, Z., Wang, L., Li, B., & Liu, W. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11203401 · Cited by 11
LiveProbe: Exploring Continuous Voice Liveness Detection via Phonemic Energy Response Patterns
Cao, H., Jiang, H., Liu, D., Wang, R., Min, G., Liu, J., Dustdar, S., & Lui, J. C. S. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3228819 · Cited by 11
Ren, Y., Peng, H., Li, L., Xue, X., Lan, Y., & Yang, Y. (2023) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2023.102981 · Cited by 12
PhantomSound: Black-Box, Query-Efficient Audio Adversarial Attack via Split-Second Phoneme Injection
Guo, H., Wang, G., Wang, Y., Chen, B., Yan, Q., & Li, X. (2023) · International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses (RAID) · doi:10.1145/3607199.3607240 · Cited by 12
Dual-Branch Knowledge Distillation for Noise-Robust Synthetic Speech Detection
Fan, C., Ding, M., Tao, J., Fu, R., Yi, J., Wen, Z., & Lv, Z. (2024) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2024.3389643 · Cited by 13
Wang, Z., & Hansen, J. H. L. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3421281 · Cited by 14
EmoFake: An Initial Dataset for Emotion Fake Audio Detection
Zhao, Y. C., Yi, J., Tao, J., Wang, C., & Dong, Y. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-8367-0_25 · Cited by 11
Convolutional neural network-based detection of audio replay attacks in speaker verification systems
Al-Karawi, K. A. (2025) · International Journal of Speech Technology · doi:10.1007/s10772-025-10173-5 · Cited by 11
Audio-Replay Attack Detection Countermeasures
Lavrentyeva, G., Novoselov, S., Malykh, E., Kozlov, A., Kudashev, O., & Shchemelinin, V. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66429-3_16 · Cited by 11
Hansen, J. H. L., & Wang, Z. (2022) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2022-904 · Cited by 14
An Experimental Study on Audio Replay Attack Detection Using Deep Neural Networks
Bakar, B., & Hanilçi, C. (2018) · IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) · doi:10.1109/slt.2018.8639511 · Cited by 11
Phoneme Specific Modelling and Scoring Techniques for Anti Spoofing System
Suthokumar, G., Sriskandaraja, K., Sethu, V., Wijenayake, C. A., & Eliathamby Ambikairajah, A. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2019.8682411 · Cited by 11
Speech frame selection for spoofing detection with an application to partially spoofed audio-data
Kumar, A. K., Paul, D., Pal, M., Sahidullah, M., & Saha, G. (2021) · International Journal of Speech Technology · doi:10.1007/s10772-020-09785-w · Cited by 12
Self-citationOptimizing Tandem Speaker Verification and Anti-Spoofing Systems
Kanervisto, A., Hautamäki, V., Kinnunen, T., & Yamagishi, J. (2021) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2021.3138681 · Cited by 12
Self-citationGarg, S. K., Bhilare, S., & Kanhangad, V. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Identity, Security and Behavior Analysis (ISBA) · doi:10.1109/isba.2019.8778535 · Cited by 11
Generalizing Speaker Verification for Spoof Awareness in the Embedding Space
Liu, X., Sahidullah, M., Lee, K. A., & Kinnunen, T. (2024) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2024.3358056 · Cited by 10
Self-citationDeepLASD countermeasure for logical access audio spoofing
Al-Tairi, H., Javed, A., Khan, T., & Saudagar, A. K. J. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-04808-5 · Cited by 12
Detecting Spoofed Speeches via Segment-Based Word CQCC and Average ZCR for Embedded Systems
Zhan, J., Pu, Z., Jiang, W., Wu, J., & Yang, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2022.3197531 · Cited by 10
Uncovering the Deceptions: An Analysis on Audio Spoofing Detection and Future Prospects
Ranjan, R., Mayank Vatsa, A., & Singh, R. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/756 · Cited by 11
DNN controlled adaptive front-end for replay attack detection systems
Wickramasinghe, B., Eliathamby Ambikairajah, A., Sethu, V., Epps, J., Li, H., & Dang, T. (2023) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2023.102973 · Cited by 10
Spectro-Temporally Compressed Source Features for Replay Attack Detection
Jelil, S., Sinha, R., & Prasanna, S. R. M. (2024) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2024.3370490 · Cited by 10
Discriminative features based on modified log magnitude spectrum for playback speech detection
Yang, J., Xu, L., Ren, B., & Ji, Y. (2020) · EURASIP Journal on Audio Speech and Music Processing · doi:10.1186/s13636-020-00173-5 · Cited by 10
Linear Prediction Residual-Based Constant-Q Cepstral Coefficients for Replay Attack Detection
Phapatanaburi, K., Buayai, P., Kupimai, M., & Yodrot, T. (2020) · International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON) · doi:10.1109/ieecon48109.2020.229465 · Cited by 10
Detection of speech playback attacks using robust harmonic trajectories
Shang, W., & Stevenson, M. (2020) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2020.101133 · Cited by 9
Liu, L., & Yang, J. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3013066 · Cited by 10
A Practical Guide to Logical Access Voice Presentation Attack Detection
Wang, X., & Yamagishi, J. (2022) · Studies in autonomic, data-driven and industrial computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-1524-6_8 · Cited by 11
Self-citationANALYSING REPLAY SPOOFING COUNTERMEASURE PERFORMANCE UNDER VARIED CONDITIONS
Chettri, B., Sturm, B. L. T., & Benetos, E. (2018) · Machine learning for signal processing ... · doi:10.1109/mlsp.2018.8516968 · Cited by 10
Device Feature Extraction Based on Parallel Neural Network Training for Replay Spoofing Detection
You, C. H., & Yang, J. (2020) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2020.3011320 · Cited by 11
Security and Machine Learning in the Real WorldPreprint
Evtimov, I., Cui, W., Kamar, E. S., Kıcıman, E., Kohno, T., & Li, J. Z. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.07205 · Cited by 10
Ability of Human Auditory Perception to Distinguish Human-Imitated Speech
Zaman, K., Li, K., Samiul, I. J. A. M., Uezu, Y., Kidani, S., & Unoki, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3526631 · Cited by 10
SUT System Description for Anti-Spoofing 2017 Challenge.
Adiban, M., Sameti, H., Maghsoodi, N., & Shahsavari, S. (2017) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · Cited by 9
Süslü, Ç., Eren, E., & Demiroğlu, C. (2022) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2021.12.003 · Cited by 9
Subband fusion of complex spectrogram for fake speech detection
Fan, C., Xue, J., Dong, S., Ding, M., Yi, J., Li, J., & Lv, Z. (2023) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2023.102988 · Cited by 10
Fang, F., Yamagishi, J., Echizen, I., Sahidullah, M., & Kinnunen, T. (2018) · IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/wifs.2018.8630764 · Cited by 9
Self-citationLight CNN Architecture Enhancement for Different Types Spoofing Attack Detection
Volkova, M., Andzhukaev, T., Lavrentyeva, G., Novoselov, S., & Kozlov, A. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26061-3_53 · Cited by 9
Replay attack detection with raw audio waves and deep learning framework
Shukla, S., Prakash, J., & Guntur, R. S. (2019) · doi:10.1109/icdse47409.2019.8971793 · Cited by 9
A Novel Approach Towards Generalization of Countermeasure for Spoofing Attack on ASV Systems
Kumar, S. R., & Bharathi, B. (2020) · Circuits Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1007/s00034-020-01501-y · Cited by 9
Generation and Detection of Media Clones
Echizen, I., Babaguchi, N., Yamagishi, J., Nitta, N., Nakashima, Y., Nakamura, K., Kono, K., Fang, F., Myojin, S., Kuang, Z., et al. (2020) · IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems · doi:10.1587/transinf.2020mui0002 · Cited by 9
Self-citationMachine Learning Mitigants for Speech Based Cyber Risk
Campi, M., Peters, G. W., Azzaoui, N., & Matsui, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3117080 · Cited by 9
Fake Speech Detection Using Modulation Spectrogram
Magazine, R., Agarwal, A., Hedge, A., & Prasanna, S. R. M. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20980-2_39 · Cited by 9
LP residual features to counter replay attacks
Mishra, J., Singh, M., & Pati, D. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Signals and Systems (ICSigSys) · doi:10.1109/icsigsys.2018.8372769 · Cited by 9
RawSpectrogram: On the Way to Effective Streaming Speech Anti-Spoofing
Grinberg, P., & Shikhov, V. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3321919 · Cited by 8
Implicit processing of linear prediction residual for replay attack detection
Veesa, S., & Singh, M. (2024) · International Journal of Speech Technology · doi:10.1007/s10772-024-10125-5 · Cited by 8
Investigating voiced and unvoiced regions of speech for audio deepfake detection
Sivaraman, G., Tak, H., & Khoury, E. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10890861 · Cited by 11
Deepfake Audio Detection in Voice Authentication: A Spectral and CNN-Based Comprehensive Review
Salih, A. O. M., Emam, A. H. M., Ahmed, A. B. G. E., Khalifa, M., Suliman, A., & Babiker, N. B. M. (2025) · Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research · doi:10.48084/etasr.13400 · Cited by 10
Avila, A. R., Alam, J., Prado, F., O’Shaughnessy, D. D., & Falk, T. H. (2020) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2020.101163 · Cited by 8
Impact of Bandwidth and Channel Variation on Presentation Attack Detection for Speaker Verification
Delgado, H., Todisco, M., Evans, N., Sahidullah, M., Liu, W. M., Alegre, F., Kinnunen, T., & Fauve, B. (2017) · 2017 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG) · doi:10.23919/biosig.2017.8053510 · Cited by 8
Self-citationReplay attack detection using excitation source and system features
Singh, M., & Pati, D. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816801-1.00002-5 · Cited by 8
Benchmarking and challenges in security and privacy for voice biometrics
Bonastre, J.-F., Delgado, H., Evans, N., Kinnunen, T., Lee, K. A., Liu, X., Nautsch, A., Noé, .-G., Patino, J., Sahidullah, M., et al. (2021) · doi:10.21437/spsc.2021-11 · Cited by 10
Self-citationSpoofing-Aware Speaker Verification by Multi-Level Fusion
Wu, H., Meng, L., Kang, J., Li, J., Li, X., Wu, X., Lee, H.-Y., & Meng, H. M. L. (2022) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2022-920 · Cited by 9
Adversarial speaker distillation for countermeasure model on automatic speaker verification
Liao, Y.-L., Chen, X., Wang, C.-C., & Jang, J. R. (2022) · Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication (SPSC) · doi:10.21437/spsc.2022-6 · Cited by 8
Linear Frequency Residual Cepstral Features for Replay Spoof Detection on ASVSpoof 2019
Gupta, P., & Patil, H. A. (2022) · European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) · doi:10.23919/eusipco55093.2022.9909913 · Cited by 8
Voice Quality Features for Replay Attack Detection
Woubie, A., & Bäckström, T. (2022) · European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) · doi:10.23919/eusipco55093.2022.9909802 · Cited by 8
Multi-Task Siamese Neural Network for Improving Replay Attack Detection
von Platen, P., Tao, F., & Tür, G. (2020) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2020-86 · Cited by 9
Adversarial Multi-Task Learning for Speaker Normalization in Replay Detection
Suthokumar, G., Sethu, V., Sriskandaraja, K., & Eliathamby Ambikairajah, A. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp40776.2020.9054322 · Cited by 8
Replay Spoof Attack Detection using Deep Neural Networks for Classification
Duraibi, S., Al-Hamdani, W. A., & Sheldon, F. T. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) · doi:10.1109/csci51800.2020.00036 · Cited by 8
Spoofing-Aware Speaker Verification with Unsupervised Domain Adaptation
Liu, X., Sahidullah, M., & Kinnunen, T. (2022) · The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop (Odyssey) · doi:10.21437/odyssey.2022-12 · Cited by 8
Self-citationSpeaker Anonymization Using X-vector and Neural Waveform ModelsPreprint
Fang, F., Wang, X., Yamagishi, J., Echizen, I., Todisco, M., Evans, N., & Bonastre, J.-F. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.13561 · Cited by 8
Self-citationTrusted Media Challenge Dataset and User Study
Chen, W., Chua, S. L. B., Winkler, S., & Ng, S.-K. (2022) · Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3511808.3557715 · Cited by 7
Huang, L. F., Yang, J., Zhao, J., & Wu, C. (2025) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.70054 · Cited by 7
Generalized Spoof Detection and Incremental Algorithm Recognition for Voice Spoofing
Guo, J., Zhao, Y., & Wang, H. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13137773 · Cited by 10
Fusion of RMFCC and RCQCC Features for Replay Attack Detection Task
Veesa, S., Badugu, V. K., & Singh, M. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence Systems (IoTaIS) · doi:10.1109/iotais60147.2023.10346062 · Cited by 7
Synthetic Speech Detection Based on the Temporal Consistency of Speaker Features
Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Lu, J., Wang, W., & Zhang, P. (2024) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2024.3381890 · Cited by 9
Speech Audio Deepfake Detection via Convolutional Neural Networks
Valente, L. P., de Souza, M. M. S., & da Rocha, A. M. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (EAIS) · doi:10.1109/eais58494.2024.10569111 · Cited by 8
Dynamic Ensemble Teacher-Student Distillation Framework for Light-Weight Fake Audio Detection
Xue, J., Fan, C., Yi, J., Zhou, J., & Lv, Z. (2024) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2024.3431936 · Cited by 8
Medusa3D: The Watchful Eye Freezing Illegitimate Users in Virtual Reality Interactions
Jiao, A., Duan, D., & Xu, W. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3676515 · Cited by 7
Blind Channel Response Estimation for Replay Attack Detection
Avila, A. R., Alam, J., O’Shaughnessy, D. D., & Falk, T. H. (2019) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2019-2956 · Cited by 7
Novel Enhanced Teager Energy Based Cepstral Coefficients for Replay Spoof Detection
Acharya, R., Patil, H. A., & Kotta, H. (2019) · IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU) · doi:10.1109/asru46091.2019.9003934 · Cited by 7
Nasersharif, B., & Yazdani, M. (2021) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.12670 · Cited by 7
A Survey on Linear Prediction Residual based Replay Attack Detection System
Singh, M. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence Systems (IoTaIS) · doi:10.1109/iotais50849.2021.9359690 · Cited by 7
Attacks on Voice Assistant Systems
Lien, J., Momin, M. A. A., & Yuan, X. (2021) · Advances in web technologies and engineering book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7323-5.ch004 · Cited by 7
Voice Spoofing Countermeasure Based on Spectral Features to Detect Synthetic Attacks Through LSTM
Qadir, G., Zareen, S., Hassan, F., & Rahman, A. U. (2022) · International Journal of Innovations in Science and Technology · doi:10.33411/ijist/2021030512 · Cited by 8
Timbre-Reserved Adversarial Attack in Speaker Identification
Wang, Q., Yao, J., Zhang, L., Guo, P., & Xie, L. (2023) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2023.3306714 · Cited by 7
Replay Attacks Detection Using Phase and Magnitude Features with Various Frequency Resolutions
Liu, M., Wang, L., Oo, Z., Dang, J., Li, D., & Nakagawa, S. (2018) · International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (ISCSLP) · doi:10.1109/iscslp.2018.8706628 · Cited by 7
Addressing Text-Dependent Speaker Verification Using Singing Speech
Shi, Y., Zhou, J., Long, Y., Li, Y., & Mao, H. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9132636 · Cited by 7
Adversarial Transformation of Spoofing Attacks for Voice Biometrics
Gomez-Alanis, A., González, J. A., & Peinado, A. M. (2021) · IberSPEECH · doi:10.21437/iberspeech.2021-54 · Cited by 8
Tackling Spoofing-Aware Speaker Verification with Multi-Model Fusion
Wu, H., Kang, J., Meng, L., Zhang, Y., Wu, X., Wu, Z., Lee, H.-Y., & Meng, H. M. L. (2022) · The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop (Odyssey) · doi:10.21437/odyssey.2022-13 · Cited by 7
Analysis of Remote Access Trojan Attack using Android Debug Bridge
Aprilliansyah, D., Riadi, I., & Sunardi (2022) · IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development) · doi:10.14421/ijid.2021.2839 · Cited by 7
Mankad, S. H., & Garg, S. (2020) · Progress in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s13748-020-00216-0 · Cited by 7
Defense against adversarial attacks on spoofing countermeasures of ASVPreprint
Wu, H., Liu, S., Meng, H. M. L., & Lee, H.-Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.03065 · Cited by 7
Recalibrated Bandpass Filtering On Temporal Waveform For Audio Spoof Detection
Ren, Y., Liu, W., Liu, D., & Wang, L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) · doi:10.1109/icip42928.2021.9506427 · Cited by 9
Multi-band Spectral Entropy Information for Detection of Replay Attacks
Liu, Y., Das, R. K., & Li, H. (2019) · Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) · doi:10.1109/apsipaasc47483.2019.9023062 · Cited by 6
Audio Deepfakes: Feature Extraction and Model Evaluation for Detection
Bhukya, R. K., Raj, A., & Raja, D. N. (2024) · International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET) · doi:10.1109/incet61516.2024.10593405 · Cited by 6
A Replay Speech Detection Algorithm Based on Sub-band Analysis
Lin, L., Wang, R., & Yan, D. (2018) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00828-4_34 · Cited by 6
Use of Claimed Speaker Models for Replay Detection
Suthokumar, G., Sriskandaraja, K., Sethu, V., Wijenayake, C. A., Eliathamby Ambikairajah, A., & Li, H. (2018) · Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) · doi:10.23919/apsipa.2018.8659510 · Cited by 6
A Comparison of Features for Replay Attack Detection
Xie, Z., Zhang, W., Chen, Z., & Xu, X. (2019) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1229/1/012079 · Cited by 6
Verifiable speech retrieval algorithm based on KNN secure hashing
Li, A., Huang, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2022) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13387-w · Cited by 6
Automatic Speaker Verification Spoof Detection and Countermeasures Using Gaussian Mixture Model
Bhukya, R. K., & Raj, A. (2022) · IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON) · doi:10.1109/upcon56432.2022.9986418 · Cited by 6
The Clever Hans Effect in Voice Spoofing Detection
Chettri, B. (2023) · IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) · doi:10.1109/slt54892.2023.10022624 · Cited by 5
AeroSense: Sensing Aerosol Emissions from Indoor Human Activities
Chhaglani, B., Zakaria, C., Peltier, R. E., Gummeson, J., & Shenoy, P. J. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3659593 · Cited by 7
Replay spoofing attack detection using deep neural networks
Bakar, B., & Hanilçi, C. (2018) · Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) · doi:10.1109/siu.2018.8404584 · Cited by 6
Combination of Amplitude and Frequency Modulation Features for Presentation Attack Detection
Kamble, M. R., & Patil, H. A. (2020) · Journal of Signal Processing Systems · doi:10.1007/s11265-020-01532-3 · Cited by 6
Scanning the Voice of Your Fingerprint With Everyday Surfaces
Rathore, A. S., Xu, C., Zhu, W., Daiyan, A., Wang, K., Lin, F., Ren, K., & Xu, W. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2021.3049217 · Cited by 6
Replay-Attack Detection Using Features With Adaptive Spectro-Temporal Resolution
Liu, M., Wang, L., Lee, K. A., Chen, X., & Dang, J. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp39728.2021.9414250 · Cited by 6
Self-citationA Comparative Performance of Optimizers and Tuning of Neural Networks for Spoof Detection Framework
Chadha, A. N., Abdullah, A. B., & Angeline, L. (2022) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2022.01304102 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Kinnunen, T., Sahidullah, M., Delgado, H., Todisco, M., Evans, N., Yamagishi, J., & Lee, K. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- EURECOM (FR)
- National Institute of Informatics (JP)
- Institute for Infocomm Research (SG)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Interspeech 2017
- Publisher
- ISCA
- Published
- 2017-08-20
- Pages
- 2-6
- ISSN
- 2308-457X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2745896134
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 13
- FWCI
- 24.45
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- erepo.uef.fi
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
- UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Graduate School and Research Center in Digital Science (EURECOM) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Commission (647850, HORIZON2020)
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (16H06302, 15H01686, 26280066)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15H01686, 16H06302, 26280066)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- speaker verification, spoofing attacks, equal error rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
