The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CellProfiler™: Free, Versatile Software for Automated Biological Image Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Careful visual examination of biological samples is quite powerful, but many visual analysis tasks done in the laboratory are repetitive, tedious, and subjective. Here we describe the use of the open-source software, CellProfiler, to automatically identify and measure a variety of biological objects in images. The applications demonstrated here include yeast colony counting and classifying, cell microarray annotation, yeast patch assays, mouse tumor quantification, wound healing assays, and tissue topology measurement. The software automatically identifies objects in digital images, counts them, and records a full spectrum of measurements for each object, including location within the image, size, shape, color intensity, degree of correlation between colors, texture (smoothness), and number of neighbors. Small numbers of images can be processed automatically on a personal computer and hundreds of thousands can be analyzed using a computing cluster. This free, easy-to-use software enables biologists to comprehensively and quantitatively address many questions that previously would have required custom programming, thereby facilitating discovery in a variety of biological fields of study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
Hsp90 Potentiates the Rapid Evolution of New Traits: Drug Resistance in Diverse Fungi
Cowen, L. E., & Lindquist, S. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1118370 · Cited by 698
Cited by
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
Bankhead, P., Loughrey, M. B., Fernández, J. A., Dombrowski, Y., McArt, D. G., Dunne, P. D., McQuaid, S., Gray, R. T., Murray, L. J., Coleman, H. G., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5 · Cited by 8,908
Shared and distinct transcriptomic cell types across neocortical areas
Tasic, B., Yao, Z., Graybuck, L. T., Smith, K. A., Nguyen, T. N., Bertagnolli, D., Goldy, J., Garren, E., Economo, M. N., Viswanathan, S., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0654-5 · Cited by 1,746
High-definition spatial transcriptomics for in situ tissue profiling
Vickovic, S., Eraslan, G., Salmén, F., Klughammer, J., Stenbeck, L., Schapiro, D., Äijö, T., Bonneau, R., Bergenstråhle, L., Navarro, J. F., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0548-y · Cited by 1,150
Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response
Keane, T. J., Londono, R., Turner, N. J., & Badylak, S. F. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054 · Cited by 613
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamprecht, M. R., Sabatini, D. M., & Carpenter, A. E.
- Venue
- BioTechniques
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-75
- ISSN
- 0736-6205 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-9818
- OpenAlex
- W2037586865
- Cited by
- 895
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CellProfiler™: Free, Versatile Software for Automated Biological Image Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2144/000112257
- The paper
- Lamprecht, M. R., Sabatini, D. M., & Carpenter, A. E. (2007). CellProfiler™: Free, Versatile Software for Automated Biological Image Analysis. BioTechniques. https://doi.org/10.2144/000112257
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
