Cited by 613Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response

Keane, Timothy J., Londono, Ricardo, Turner, Neill J., Badylak, Stephen F.·2012·Biomaterials

Abstract

Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are routinely used for a variety of clinical applications. Despite known variations in tissue remodeling outcomes, quantitative criteria by which decellularization can be assessed were only recently described and as a result, the amount of retained cellular material varies widely among commercial products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of ineffective decellularization on the host response. Three different methods of decellularization were used to decellularize porcine small intestinal ECM (SIS-ECM). The amount of cell remnants was quantified by the amount and fragmentation of DNA within the scaffold materials. The M1/M2 phenotypic polarization profile of macrophages, activated in response to these ECM scaffolds, was assessed in vitro and in vivo using a rodent model of body wall repair. The results show that, in vitro, more aggressive decellularization is associated with a shift in macrophage phenotype predominance from M1 to M2. While this shift was not quantitatively apparent in vivo, notable differences were found in the distribution of M1 vs. M2 macrophages within the various scaffolds. A clear association between macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcome exists and effective decellularization remains an important component in the processing of ECM-based scaffolds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inadequate decellularization retains high amounts of DAMPs or endotoxin, and excessive crosslinking biases macrophages toward pro-inflammatory phenotypes that drive fibrosis and poor remodeling.

    “Mechanistically, inadequate decellularization retains high amounts of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) or endotoxin, and excessive crosslinking biases macrophages toward pro-inflammatory phenotypes that drive fibrosis and poor remodeling [73,74].”
  • Insufficient DNA removal correlates with increased inflammatory infiltration and impaired remodeling.

    “Some studies have shown that insufficient DNA removal correlates with increased inflammatory infiltration and impaired remodeling [73].”
  • Not all decellularization protocols are equally effective at removing cells or other immunogenic species, which can cause varying host immune responses and failure of implants in clinical trials.

    “A related difficulty is that not all decellularization protocols are equally effective at removing cells or other immunogenic species, which can cause varying host immune responses and failure of implants in clinical trials122.”

    From Towards organoid culture without Matrigel (2021) · cites this paper as [122]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keane, T. J., Londono, R., Turner, N. J., & Badylak, S. F.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Badylak, Stephen F.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1771-1781
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984133400
Cited by
613
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 17
FWCI
35.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 AR054940)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
decellularization, biological scaffolds, extracellular matrix, small intestinal submucosa, host response, macrophage polarization, M1/M2 macrophages, tissue remodeling, DNA fragmentation
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, DNA, Extracellular Matrix, Immune System, Intestine, Small, Macrophages, Materials Testing, Models, Biological, Peracetic Acid, Phenotype, Swine, Time Factors, Wound Healing, Tissue Engineering, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review