The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reducing the Impact of PCR-Mediated Recombination in Molecular Evolution and Environmental Studies Using a New-Generation High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase
Open accessAbstract
PCR-mediated recombination can greatly impact estimates of diversity, both in environmental studies and in analyses of gene family evolution. Here we measure chimera (PCR-mediated recombinant) formation by analyzing a mixture of eight partial actin sequences isolated from the amoeba Arcella hemisphaerica amplified under a variety of conditions that mimic standard laboratory situations. We further compare a new-generation proofreading processivity-enhanced polymerase to both a standard proofreading enzyme and previously published results. Proofreading polymerases are preferred over other polymerases in instances where evolutionary inferences must be made. Our analyses reveal that reducing the initial template concentration is as critical as reducing the number of cycles for decreasing chimera formation and improving accuracy. Furthermore, assessing the efficiency of recovery of original haplotypes demonstrates that multiple PCR reactions are required to capture the actual genetic diversity of a sample. Finally, the experiments confirm that processivity-enhanced polymerases enable a substantial decrease in PCR-mediated recombination through reducing starting template concentration, without compromising the robustness of PCR reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection
Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C., & Knight, R. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 · Cited by 15,114
Removing Noise From Pyrosequenced Amplicons
Quince, C., Lanzen, A., Davenport, R. J., & Turnbaugh, P. J. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-38 · Cited by 1,592
Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform
Kircher, M., Sawyer, S., & Meyer, M. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr771 · Cited by 1,106
Fungal community analysis by high‐throughput sequencing of amplified markers – a user's guide
Lindahl, B. D., Nilsson, R. H., Tedersoo, L., Abarenkov, K., Carlsen, T., Kjøller, R., Kõljalg, U., Pennanen, T., Rosendahl, S., Stenlid, J., et al. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12243 · Cited by 892
Systematic improvement of amplicon marker gene methods for increased accuracy in microbiome studies
Gohl, D. M., Vangay, P., Garbe, J., MacLean, A., Hauge, A., Becker, A., Gould, T. J., Clayton, J. B., Johnson, T. J., Hunter, R., et al. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3601 · Cited by 819
Metadata
- Authors
- Lahr, D. J. G., & Katz, L. A.
- Venue
- BioTechniques
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 857-866
- ISSN
- 0736-6205 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-9818
- OpenAlex
- W2133576010
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reducing the Impact of PCR-Mediated Recombination in Molecular Evolution and Environmental Studies Using a New-Generation High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2144/000113219
- The paper
- Lahr, D. J. G., & Katz, L. A. (2009). Reducing the Impact of PCR-Mediated Recombination in Molecular Evolution and Environmental Studies Using a New-Generation High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase. BioTechniques. https://doi.org/10.2144/000113219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.