The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mutation detection using Surveyor™ nuclease
Open accessAbstract
We have developed a simple and flexible mutation detection technology for the discovery and mapping of both known and unknown mutations. This technology is based on a new mismatch-specific DNA endonuclease from celery, Surveyor nuclease, which is a member of the CEL nuclease family of plant DNA endonucleases. Surveyor nuclease cleaves with high specificity at the 3' side of any mismatch site in both DNA strands, including all base substitutions and insertion/deletions up to at least 12 nucleotides. Surveyor nuclease technology involves four steps: (i) PCR to amplify target DNA from both mutant and wild-type reference DNA; (ii) hybridization to form heteroduplexes between mutant and wild-type reference DNA; (iii) treatment of annealed DNA with Surveyor nuclease to cleave heteroduplexes; and (iv) analysis of digested DNA products using the detection/separation platform of choice. The technology is highly sensitive, detecting rare mutants present at as low as 1 in 32 copies. Unlabeled Surveyor nuclease digestion products can be analyzed using conventional gel electrophoresis or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), while end labeled digestion products are suitable for analysis by automated gel or capillary electrophoresis. The entire protocol can be performed in less than a day and is suitable for automated and high-throughput procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition
Brinkman, E. K., Chen, T., Amendola, M., & van Steensel, B. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku936 · Cited by 2,390
RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells
Jinek, M., East, A., Cheng, A., Lin, S., Ma, E., & Doudna, J. (2013) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.00471 · Cited by 2,098
An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing
Miller, J. C., Holmes, M. C., Wang, J., Guschin, D. Y., Lee, Y.-L., Rupniewski, I., Beausejour, C. M., Waite, A. J., Wang, N. S., Kim, K. A., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1319 · Cited by 1,051
Establishment of HIV-1 resistance in CD4+ T cells by genome editing using zinc-finger nucleases
Perez, E. E., Wang, J., Miller, J. C., Jouvenot, Y., Kim, K. A., Liu, O., Wang, N., Lee, G., Bartsevich, V. V., Lee, Y.-L., et al. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1410 · Cited by 999
Genome Engineering with Targetable Nucleases
Carroll, D. (2014) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035418 · Cited by 568
Metadata
- Authors
- Qiu, P., Shandilya, H., D'Alessio, J. M., O'Connor, K., Durocher, J., & Gerard, G. F.
- Venue
- BioTechniques
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 702-707
- ISSN
- 0736-6205 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-9818
- OpenAlex
- W1513438412
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutation detection using Surveyor™ nuclease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2144/04364pf01
- The paper
- Qiu, P., Shandilya, H., D'Alessio, J. M., O'Connor, K., Durocher, J., & Gerard, G. F. (2004). Mutation detection using Surveyor™ nuclease. BioTechniques. https://doi.org/10.2144/04364pf01
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.