The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR
Open accessAbstract
Analysis of RNA expression using techniques like real-time PCR has traditionally used reference or housekeeping genes to control for error between samples. This practice is being questioned as it becomes increasingly clear that some housekeeping genes may vary considerably in certain biological samples. We used real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) to assess the levels of 13 housekeeping genes expressed in peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture and whole blood from healthy individuals and those with tuberculosis. Housekeeping genes were selected from conventionally used ones and from genes reported to be invariant in human T cell culture. None of the commonly used housekeeping genes [e.g., glyceraldehyde-phosphate-dehydrogenase (GAPDH)] were found to be suitable as internal references, as they were highly variable (>30-fold maximal variability). Furthermore, genes previously found to be invariant in human T cell culture also showed large variation in RNA expression (>34-fold maximal variability). Genes that were invariant in blood were highly variable in peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture. Our data show that RNA specifying human acidic ribosomal protein was the most suitable housekeeping gene for normalizing mRNA levels in human pulmonary tuberculosis. Validations of housekeeping genes are highly specific for a particular experimental model and are a crucial component in assessing any new model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
Cited by
Twenty-Five Years of Quantitative PCR for Gene Expression Analysis
VanGuilder, H. D., Vrana, K. E., & Freeman, W. M. (2008) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000112776 · Cited by 1,246
Dheda, K., Huggett, J. F., Chang, J. S., Kim, L. U., Bustin, S. A., Johnson, M. A., Rook, G. A. W., & Zumla, A. (2005) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ab.2005.05.022 · Cited by 668
Self-citationPettinelli, P., & Videla, L. A. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-2129 · Cited by 351
Yang, Y., Creer, A., Jemiolo, B., & Trappe, S. (2005) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2004 · Cited by 290
(2020) · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa609 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Dheda, K., Huggett, J. F., Bustin, S. A., Johnson, M. A., Rook, G., & Zumla, A.
- Venue
- BioTechniques
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 112-119
- ISSN
- 0736-6205 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-9818
- OpenAlex
- W2126835198
- Cited by
- 1,034
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2144/04371rr03
- The paper
- Dheda, K., Huggett, J. F., Bustin, S. A., Johnson, M. A., Rook, G., & Zumla, A. (2004). Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. BioTechniques. https://doi.org/10.2144/04371rr03
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.