Cited by 17Estrogen and related hormone effectsMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Exemestane for primary prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Zhang, Yang, Simondsen, Katherine, Kolesar, Jill M.·2012·American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

Abstract

Purpose The benefits and risks of exemestane for the primary prevention of breast cancer are discussed and compared with other breast cancer chemoprevention therapies. Summary Selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs) are the current mainstay for primary prevention of breast cancer. As an alternative, exemestane, an aromatase inhibitor, has been evaluated for breast cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. A study of 4560 high-risk postmenopausal women taking exemestane 25 mg daily for a median of three years found a 65% relative reduction in the annual occurrence of invasive breast cancer compared with placebo (0.19% versus 0.55%; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.70; p = 0.002) and a 53% reduction in invasive plus noninvasive breast cancer (0.35% versus 0.77%; hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.79; p = 0.04). Adverse effects from exemestane are generally mild, with the most common being diarrhea, joint pain, and menopausal-related symptoms. Importantly, exemestane did not increase the risks of endometrial cancers, thromboembolism, cardiovascular events, or cataracts. However, joint stiffness and arthralgia were more common when compared with tamoxifen or raloxifene. Ongoing clinical trials with other aromatase inhibitors are underway to evaluate the benefits and long-term skeletal risks. Conclusion Exemestane 25 mg daily taken for at least three years is a new option for the prevention of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women. Indirec…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2146/ajhp110585

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Simondsen, K., & Kolesar, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Kolesar, Jill M.
Venue
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Published
2012-08-15
Volume
69
Issue
16
Pages
1384-1388
ISSN
  • 1079-2082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-2900
OpenAlex
W1977637853
Cited by
15
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
exemestane, breast cancer chemoprevention, primary prevention, aromatase inhibitors, postmenopausal women, selective estrogen receptor modulators, tamoxifen, raloxifene, adverse effects, osteoporosis, thromboembolism, endometrial cancer, high-risk women
MeSH terms
Androstadienes, Breast Neoplasms, Estrogen Antagonists, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Primary Prevention, Tamoxifen, Postmenopause, Risk Assessment, Chemoprevention, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators, Raloxifene Hydrochloride, Aromatase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review