Cited by 8Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Evaluation of the Effects of an Intervention Intended to Optimize the Sleep Environment Among the Elderly: An Exploratory Study

Open access
Desjardins, Sophie, Lapierre, Sylvie, Vasiliadis, Helen-Maria, Hudon, Carol·2020·Clinical Interventions in Aging

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this exploratory study was to evaluate the effects of a brief intervention intended to optimize the sleep environment in older people living in the community and to examine the way these effects change over time. METHODS: The sample was made up of 44 participants (19 men and 25 women) aged 65-85 years, with a mean age of 71.4. The intervention consisted in a group training session that covered the reasons for and ways to ("why" and "how") optimize a sleep environment. It comprises six themes: air quality and odors, luminosity, noises and sounds, comfort of the mattress, comfort of the pillow, and temperature. Participants completed a set of questionnaires before the intervention, and one month and four months later. RESULTS: Four months after the intervention, the replies to the questionnaires showed that the participants experienced reduced severity of insomnia, sleep latency and anxiety. The subjective quality of the participants' sleep along with their sleep efficacy also increased significantly during the same period. CONCLUSION: A brief intervention intended to optimize the sleep environment appears promising as an addition or alternative to the two other sleep improvement options generally offered to older people: medication and cognitive behavioral therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/cia.s277252

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT helps individuals with GAD identify and modify maladaptive or catastrophic thinking patterns, promotes more balanced cognitive appraisals, and reduces anxiety severity.

    “CBT helps individuals identify and modify maladaptive or catastrophic thinking pa erns, promotes more balanced cognitive appraisals, and reduces anxiety severity [103,104].”

    From Pre-Sleep Anxiety: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches in Clinical Practice. (2026) · cites this paper as [104]

    The Introduction mentions cognitive behavioral therapy as an option for improving sleep in older adults, but does not describe cognitive restructuring or its effects on generalized anxiety disorder. The Results report reduced anxiety after a sleep-environment intervention, not after CBT. Searches for catastrophic thinking, balanced appraisals, and CBT-related anxiety reduction found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [52]Blais FC, Gendron L, Mimeault V, Morin CM. Évaluation de l’insomnie: validation de trois questionnaires [Assessment of insomnia: validation of three questionnaires]. Encephale. 1997; 23(6): 447– 453. 9488928
  2. [57]Yesavage JA. Geriatric Depression Scale. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988; 24: 709– 711. 3249773
  3. [68]Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1969: pp. 287–280.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Desjardins, S., Lapierre, S., Vasiliadis, H.-M., & Hudon, C.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Desjardins, Sophie
Venue
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Published
2020-11
Volume
Volume 15
Pages
2117-2127
ISSN
  • 1176-9092 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-1998
OpenAlex
W3102644255
Cited by
8
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Interventions in Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
sleep environment, older adults, brief intervention, insomnia, sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep anxiety, air quality, noise, lighting, room temperature, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Sleep Hygiene, Sleep Latency, Aged, Environment, Environmental Exposure, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review