Cited by 20Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementMedical Practices and RehabilitationFrailty in Older Adults

Predictors of improved functional outcome in elderly inpatients after rehabilitation: a retrospective study

Open access
Naruishi, Koji, Kunita, Akiko, Kubo, Katsuyuki, Nagata, Toshihiko, Takashiba, Shogo, Adachi, Seiji·2014·Clinical Interventions in Aging

Abstract

PURPOSE: The number of elderly inpatients has been steadily increasing worldwide. However, the ability to predict the degree of improvement of functional capacity after comprehensive examination of elderly inpatients is still lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictors of improved functional outcome after rehabilitation of elderly inpatients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study with 1,079 patients (age <70 years: N=331, age ≥70 years: N=748) who had been admitted to Tottori Municipal Hospital. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores were measured both at admission and discharge to calculate FIM gain and efficiency. Of these patients, 262 patients had oral examinations on admission. The Mann-Whitney U-test or chi-square test was used for statistical analyses. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to compute the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Cut-off values of FIM scores to determine if elderly inpatients were able to return home after discharge were determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: FIM scores, including FIM gain and efficiency, of elderly patients were significantly lower than those of middle-aged patients. Inability to close the lips and dysfunctional tongue movement, but not the loss of teeth, were correlated with a reduced improvement of FIM scores. Cognitive impairment and aspiration pneumonia, but not cerebrovascular disease, were also correlated with a reduced improvement of FIM scores. Interestingly, FIM scores were significantly lower in patients with both cerebrovascular disease and a loss of posterior occlusion. Factors shown to have a significant impact on the improvement of FIM scores included the stable posterior occlusion (OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1), closed lips (OR: 5.15, 95% CI: 2.3-11.7), functional tongue movement (OR: 5.74, 95% CI: 3.0-11.0), presence of cognitive impairment (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.17-0.49), and presence of aspiration pneumonia (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.15-0.51). CONCLUSION: Age and disorder of oral function may be significant predictors of improved functional capacity after rehabilitation for elderly inpatients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/cia.s73388

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naruishi, K., Kunita, A., Kubo, K., Nagata, T., Takashiba, S., & Adachi, S.
Affiliations
  • Okayama University Hospital (JP)
  • Tottori Municipal Hospital (JP)
  • Tokushima University (JP)
  • Okayama University (JP)
Corresponding author
Naruishi, Koji
Venue
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Published
2014-12
Volume
9
Pages
2133
ISSN
  • 1176-9092 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-1998
OpenAlex
W1969701633
Cited by
20
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Interventions in Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
hospitalized older adults, functional outcome, rehabilitation, Functional Independence Measure, predictors of functional recovery, oral function, posterior occlusion, lip closure, tongue movement, cognitive impairment, aspiration pneumonia, cerebrovascular disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Patient Discharge, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review