The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: the Danish National Pathology Registry and Data Bank
Open accessAbstract
Diagnostic histological and cytological specimens are routinely stored in pathology department archives. These biobanks are a valuable research resource for many diseases, particularly if they can be linked to high quality population-based health registries, allowing large retrospective epidemiological studies to be carried out. Such studies are of significant importance, for example in the search for novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers in the era of personalized medicine. Denmark has a wealth of highly-regarded population-based registries that are ideally suited to conduct this type of epidemiological research. We describe two recent additions to these databases: the Danish National Pathology Registry (DNPR) and its underlying national online registration database, the Danish Pathology Data Bank (DPDB). The DNPR and the DPDB contain detailed nationwide records of all pathology specimens analyzed in Denmark since 1997, and an incomplete but nonetheless valuable record of specimens from some pathology departments dating back to the 1970s. The data are of high quality and completeness and are sufficient to allow precise and efficient localization of the specimens. We describe the relatively uncomplicated procedures required to use these pathology databases in clinical research and to gain access to the archived specimens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of Archived Specimens in Evaluation of Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers
Simon, R. M., Paik, S., & Hayes, D. F. (2009) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djp335 · Cited by 1,037
When an Entire Country Is a Cohort
Frank, L. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5462.2398 · Cited by 864
The Danish Cancer Registry--history, content, quality and use.
Storm, H. H., Michelsen, E. V., Clemmensen, I. H., & Pihl, J. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 790
Sources of Bias in Specimens for Research About Molecular Markers for Cancer
Ransohoff, D. F., & Gourlay, M. L. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.25.6065 · Cited by 201
Jepsen, P., Vilstrup, H., & Sørensen, H. T. (2008) · BMC Gastroenterology · doi:10.1186/1471-230x-8-3 · Cited by 64
Friis, S., Poulsen, A. H., Sørensen, H. T., Tjønneland, A. M., Overvad, K., Vogel, U. B., McLaughlin, J. K., Blot, W. J., & Olsen, J. H. (2009) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1007/s10552-008-9286-7 · Cited by 48
Donovan, M. J., Costa, J. C., & Cordon‐Cardo, C. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24353 · Cited by 21
Cited by
Schmidt, M., Schmidt, S. A. J., Adelborg, K., Sundbøll, J., Laugesen, K., Ehrenstein, V., & Sørensen, H. T. (2019) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s179083 · Cited by 1,379
Tranberg, M., Bech, B. H., Blaakær, J., Jensen, J. S., Svanholm, H., & Andersen, B. (2018) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-018-4165-4 · Cited by 92
Harder, E., Juul, K. E., Jensen, S. M., Thomsen, L. T., Frederiksen, K., & Kjaer, S. K. (2018) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.035 · Cited by 70
Family occurrence of autoimmune hepatitis: A Danish nationwide registry-based cohort study
Grønbæk, L., Vilstrup, H., Pedersen, L., Christensen, K., & Jepsen, P. (2018) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.05.035 · Cited by 50
Thomsen, L. T., Kjær, S. K., Munk, C., Ørnskov, D., & Waldstrøm, M. (2021) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.14121 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Erichsen
- Venue
- Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 51
- ISSN
- 1179-1349 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168905545
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
