Cited by 13Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBody Composition Measurement TechniquesAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Visceral Adiposity Index and Lipid Accumulation Product as Effective Markers of Different Obesity Phenotypes in Korean Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Open access
Yu, Sung Ryul, Shin, Kyung-A·2023·Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity

Abstract

Purpose: The visceral adiposity index (VAI) and lipid accumulation product (LAP) are useful for assessing visceral obesity. However, these indices were developed for Caucasians, and it is necessary to confirm whether the VAI and LAP are appropriate indicators for identifying obesity phenotypes in Asians. This study investigated whether the VAI and LAP are effective indicators for diagnosing four obesity phenotypes in South Korean adults. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 23,310 adult participants (age ≥20 years) who had undergone a health checkup at a general hospital in Gyeonggi-do, South Korea from January 2017 to December 2020. VAI and LAP were calculated based on the presented mathematical model according to sex. According to the metabolic health status and presence or absence of obesity, the obesity phenotypes were classified into 4 groups: metabolically healthy non-obese (N=14,240, 61.1%), metabolically unhealthy non-obese (N=477, 2.0%), metabolically healthy obese (MHO; N=6796, 29.2%), and metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO; N=1797, 7.7%). Results: The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis showed VAI best predicted MUO among the four obesity phenotypes, whereas the LAP showed excellent discriminating ability for the MUO group (area under the curve 0.877, 0.849, and 0.921 and 0.923, 0.907, and 0.954 for all participants, men, and women, respectively). The optimal VAI cutoff values for identifying the MUO group were 1.83 in men and 1.58 in women, and the optimal cutoff values for the LAP were 41.45 in men and 23.83 in women, with a higher value for men. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the VAI and LAP were associated with an increased risk in the MHO and MUO groups among the obesity phenotypes in both sexes. Conclusion: In South Korean adults, the VAI and LAP are closely related to the MUO phenotype in both sexes and are effective indices for predicting the MUO phenotype.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/dmso.s397043

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Difference between VAI (A) and LAP (B) according to obesity phenotype.
Figure 1 Difference between VAI (A) and LAP (B) according to obesity phenotype.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Stefan, 2008, Arch Intern Med, 168, 1609, 10.1001/archinte.168.15.1609 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Khandekar, 2011, Nat Rev Cancer, 11, 886, 10.1038/nrc3174 · DOI
  3. Kahn, 2006, Nature, 444, 840, 10.1038/nature05482 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Van Gaal, 2006, Nature, 444, 875, 10.1038/nature05487 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Flegal, 2013, JAMA, 309, 71, 10.1001/jama.2012.113905 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Beleigoli, 2012, PLoS One, 7, e52111, 10.1371/journal.pone.0052111 · DOI
  7. Karelis, 2008, Lancet, 372, 1281, 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61531-7 · DOI
  8. Hinnouho, 2013, Diabetes Care, 36, 2294, 10.2337/dc12-1654 · DOI
  9. Liu, 2019, Obes Facts, 12, 78, 10.1159/000495852 · DOI
  10. Phillips, 2013, PLoS One, 8, e76188, 10.1371/journal.pone.0076188 · DOI
  11. Du, 2015, Acta Diabetol, 52, 855, 10.1007/s00592-015-0715-2 · DOI
  12. Hwang, 2015, Int J Obes, 39, 1365, 10.1038/ijo.2015.75 · DOI
  13. Aydin, 2013, Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 17, 2295
  14. Biyik, 2019, Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 23, 2167
  15. Amato, 2010, Diabetes Care, 33, 920, 10.2337/dc09-1825 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kahn, 2005, BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 5, 26, 10.1186/1471-2261-5-26 · DOI
  17. Bozorgmanesh, 2010, Lipids Health Dis, 9, 100, 10.1186/1476-511X-9-100 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Zhang, 2016, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 13, 428, 10.3390/ijerph13040428 · DOI
  19. Gordon-Larsen, 2013, Obesity, 21, E166, 10.1002/oby.20409 · DOI
  20. Moon, 2010, J Prev Med Public Health, 43, 213, 10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.3.213 · DOI
  21. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285:2486–2497. · DOI · Paper page
  22. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–163. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Ozcelik, 2016, Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 20, 2475
  24. Hou, 2013, PLoS One, 8, e57319, 10.1371/journal.pone.0057319 · DOI
  25. Primeau, 2011, Int J Obes, 35, 971, 10.1038/ijo.2010.216 · DOI
  26. Choi, 2019, Korean J Fam Med, 40, 176, 10.4082/kjfm.18.0139 · DOI
  27. Park, 2001, Obes Res, 9, 381, 10.1038/oby.2001.49 · DOI
  28. Caterson, 2002, Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 16, 595, 10.1053/beem.2002.0228 · DOI
  29. Abruzzese, 2017, Horm Metab Res, 49, 23
  30. Ferreira, 2019, Public Health Nutr, 22, 1545, 10.1017/S136898001800335X · DOI
  31. Janghorbani, 2017, High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev, 24, 157, 10.1007/s40292-017-0186-3 · DOI
  32. Shin, 2019, Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 12, 2251, 10.2147/DMSO.S217628 · DOI
  33. Motamed, 2016, J Endocrinol Invest, 39, 375, 10.1007/s40618-015-0369-5 · DOI
  34. Kahn, 2008, Int J Obes, 32, 136, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803697 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Yu, S. R., & Shin, K.-A.
Affiliations
  • Semyung University (KR)
  • Shinsung University (KR)
Corresponding author
Shin, Kyung-A
Venue
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
Published
2023-02
Volume
Volume 16
Pages
495-504
ISSN
1178-7007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321255137
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
visceral adiposity index, lipid accumulation product, obesity phenotypes, metabolically healthy obesity, metabolically unhealthy obesity, visceral obesity, Asian adults, Korean adults, cut-off values, sex differences, metabolic health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review