Cited by 14Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareMachine Learning in Healthcare

Machine learning-based predictive Modeling of diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes using integrated biomarkers: A single-Center retrospective study

Open access
Zhu, Ying, Zhang, Yiyi, Yang, Miao, Tang, Nie, Liu, Limei, Wu, Jichuan, Yang, Yan·2024·Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity

Abstract

Purpose: Diabetic nephropathy (DN), a major complication of diabetes mellitus, significantly impacts global health. Identifying individuals at risk of developing DN is crucial for early intervention and improving patient outcomes. This study aims to develop and validate a machine learning-based predictive model using integrated biomarkers. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on a baseline dataset involving 2184 participants without DN, categorized based on their development of DN over a follow-up period of 36 months: DN (n=1270) and Non-DN (n=914). Various demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed. The findings were validated using an independent dataset comprising 468 participants, with 273 developing DN and 195 remaining as Non-DN over the follow-up period. Machine learning algorithms, alongside traditional descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses. Results: Elevated levels of serum creatinine, urea, and reduced eGFR, alongside an increased prevalence of retinopathy and peripheral neuropathy, were prominently observed in those who developed DN. Validation on the independent dataset further confirmed the model's robustness and consistency. The SVM model demonstrated superior performance in the training set (AUC=0.79, F1-score=0.74) and testing set (AUC=0.83, F1-score=0.82), outperforming other models. Significant predictors of DN included serum creatinine, eGFR, presence of diabetic retinopathy, and peripheral neuropathy. Conclusion: Integrating machine learning algorithms with clinical and biomarker data at baseline offers a promising avenue for identifying individuals at risk of developing diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes patients over a 36-month period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/dmso.s458263

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most DN clinical feature-based studies did not specify the prediction horizon, with only a few targeting new-onset DN over 1- or 3-year periods.

    “Notably, most studies did not specify the prediction horizon, with only a few targeting new-onset DN over 1- or 3-year periods [65, 70].”

    From Artificial intelligence-powered prediction of diabetic complications: from clinical data to molecular omics (2026) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Abstract Methods and Methods > Data Collection and Variables describe patients initially free of DN who were followed for 36 months to identify new cases. This supports the paper as an example of a three-year prediction study, but it does not establish that most other studies omitted a prediction horizon or address the one-year studies. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Zhu et al. analyzed historical EHR data from 2184 Chinese T2D patients and developed an SVM-based model for DN prediction.

    “Zhu et al. [65] analyzed historical EHR data from 2184 Chinese T2D patients and developed an SVM-based model for DN prediction.”
  • Zhu et al. developed a SVM-based risk prediction model for DN complications based on real-world EHR data from China.

    “Zhu et al. [65] developed a SVM-based risk prediction model for DN complications based on real-world EHR data from China.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, M., Tang, N., Liu, L., Wu, J., & Yang, Y.
Affiliations
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Yan
Venue
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
Published
2024-05
Volume
Volume 17
Pages
1987-1997
ISSN
1178-7007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396811038
Cited by
14
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
diabetic nephropathy, type 2 diabetes, risk prediction, predictive modeling, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetic retinopathy, peripheral neuropathy, support vector machine, early detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review