Cited by 50Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsSilk-based biomaterials and applicationsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Evaluation of a simple off-the-shelf bi-layered vascular scaffold based on poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone)/silk fibroin in vitro and in vivo

Open access
Jin, Dawei, Hu, Junfeng, Xia, Dekai, Liu, A'li, Kuang, Haizhu, Du, Jun, Mo, Xiumei, Yin, Meng·2019·International Journal of Nanomedicine

Abstract

Purpose: In the field of small-caliber vascular scaffold research, excellent vascular remodeling is the key to ensuring anticoagulant function. We prepared an off-the-shelf bi-layered vascular scaffold with a dense inner layer and a loose outer layer and evaluated its remodeling capabilities by in vivo transplantation. Materials and Methods: Based on poly(L-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) (PLCL), silk fibroin(SF), and heparin (Hep), PLCL/SF/Hep bi-layered scaffolds and PLCL/Hep bi-layered scaffolds were prepared by electrospinning. The inner layer was a PLCL/SF/Hep or PLCL/Hep nanofiber membrane, and the outer layer was PLCL/SF nano yarn. The in vitro tests included a hydrophilicity test, mechanical properties test, and blood and cell compatibility evaluation. The in vivo evaluation was conducted via single rabbit carotid artery replacement and subsequent examinations, including ultrasound imaging, immunoglobulin assays, and tissue section staining. Results: Compared to the PLCL/Hep nanofiber membrane, the hydrophilicity of the PLCL/SF/Hep nanofiber membrane was significantly improved. The mechanical strength met application requirements. Both the blood and cell compatibility were optimal. Most importantly, the PLCL/SF/Hep scaffolds maintained lumen patency for 3 months after carotid artery transplantation in live rabbits. At the same time, CD31 and α-SMA immunofluorescence staining confirmed bionic endothelial and smooth muscle layers remodeling. Conclusion: Using this hybrid strategy, PLCL and SF were combined to manufacture bi-layered small-caliber vascular scaffolds; these PLCL/SF/Hep scaffolds showed satisfactory vascular remodeling Keywords: silk fibroin, small-caliber, vascular remodeling, hybrid strategy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ijn.s205569

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adding heparin to PLCL vascular stents enhances anticoagulant performance.

    “most studies choose to add heparin to PLCL vascular stents to enhance the anticoagulant performance of the stents [156–158].”

    From Application of PLCL as a biodegradable polymer in biomedical engineering (2026) · cites this paper as [156]

    The Methods describe heparin-loaded PLCL vascular scaffolds, so the paper supports their use as an example. But the Results attribute improved blood compatibility and antithrombotic capacity to adding silk fibroin to PLCL/Hep, not to adding heparin to PLCL; the paper also does not establish that most studies use heparin for this purpose. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 50

Authors
Jin, D., Hu, J., Xia, D., Liu, A., Kuang, H., Du, J., Mo, X., & Yin, M.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Donghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Mo, Xiumei
  • Yin, Meng
Venue
International Journal of Nanomedicine
Published
2019-06
Volume
Volume 14
Pages
4261-4276
ISSN
  • 1176-9114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-2013
OpenAlex
W2948814265
Cited by
50
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nanomedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation (16CR3078B)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (TM201504)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
small-diameter vascular grafts, poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone), silk fibroin, heparin, vascular remodeling, electrospun nanofibers, carotid artery replacement, endothelialization, smooth muscle cell proliferation, anticoagulant activity, hydrophilicity, mechanical properties, hemocompatibility, rabbit model
MeSH terms
Animals, Carotid Arteries, Fibroins, Heparin, Humans, Materials Testing, Platelet Adhesiveness, Polyesters, Rabbits, Prostheses and Implants, Tissue Engineering, Cell Proliferation, Tissue Scaffolds, Nanofibers, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells, Drug Liberation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review