The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial applications of nanotechnology: methods and literature
Open accessAbstract
The need for novel antibiotics comes from the relatively high incidence of bacterial infection and the growing resistance of bacteria to conventional antibiotics. Consequently, new methods for reducing bacteria activity (and associated infections) are badly needed. Nanotechnology, the use of materials with dimensions on the atomic or molecular scale, has become increasingly utilized for medical applications and is of great interest as an approach to killing or reducing the activity of numerous microorganisms. While some natural antibacterial materials, such as zinc and silver, possess greater antibacterial properties as particle size is reduced into the nanometer regime (due to the increased surface to volume ratio of a given mass of particles), the physical structure of a nanoparticle itself and the way in which it interacts with and penetrates into bacteria appears to also provide unique bactericidal mechanisms. A variety of techniques to evaluate bacteria viability, each with unique advantages and disadvantages, has been established and must be understood in order to determine the effectiveness of nanoparticles (diameter ≤ 100 nm) as antimicrobial agents. In addition to addressing those techniques, a review of select literature and a summary of bacteriostatic and bactericidal mechanisms are covered in this manuscript.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brunner, T. J., Wick, P., Manser, P., Spohn, P., Grass, R. N., Limbach, L. K., Bruinink, A., & Stark, W. J. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es052069i · Cited by 1,385
Health Care–Associated Invasive MRSA Infections, 2005-2008
Kallen, A. J. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1115 · Cited by 439
Cited by
Alternative Antimicrobial Approach: Nano-Antimicrobial Materials
Beyth, N., Houri-Haddad, Y., Domb, A., Khan, W., & Hazan, R. (2015) · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2015/246012 · Cited by 837
Antimicrobial Activity of Metal and Metal‐Oxide Based Nanoparticles
Gold, K., Slay, B., Knackstedt, M., & Gaharwar, A. K. (2018) · Advanced Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/adtp.201700033 · Cited by 758
Khezerlou, A., Alizadeh-Sani, M., Azizi-Lalabadi, M., & Ehsani, A. (2018) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2018.08.008 · Cited by 404
Cai, L., Chen, J., Liu, Z., Wang, H., Yang, H., & Ding, W. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00790 · Cited by 365
Sharma, C., Rokana, N., Chandra, M., Singh, B. P., Gulhane, R. D., Gill, J. P. S., Ray, P., Puniya, A. K., & Panwar, H. (2018) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2017.00237 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Webster, T. J., & Seil, I.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nanomedicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 2767
- ISSN
- 1176-9114 (ISSN-L)
- 1178-2013
- OpenAlex
- W2090189991
- Cited by
- 1,010
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial applications of nanotechnology: methods and literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2147/ijn.s24805
- The paper
- Webster, T. J., & Seil, I. (2012). Antimicrobial applications of nanotechnology: methods and literature. International Journal of Nanomedicine. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s24805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.