Cited by 81Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareReproductive Health and Contraception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of Higher Educational Attainment on Antenatal Care Utilization Among Pregnant Women in East Africa Using Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 2010 to 2018: A Multilevel Analysis

Open access
Raru, Temam Beshir, Ayana, Galana Mamo, Zakaria, Hamdi Fekredin, Merga, Bedasa Taye·2022·International Journal of Women's Health

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of antenatal care (ANC) plays a major role in minimizing maternal and child mortality through effective and appropriate screening, preventive, or treatment intervention. Even though almost all pregnancy-related mortalities are largely preventable through adequate use of ANC, sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), particularly East African Countries, continues to share the largest share of global maternal, and newborn mortality. Therefore, this study assesses if educational attainment is associated with optimal ANC utilization in East Africa. METHODS: A secondary data analysis was done based on Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 2010 to 2018 in the 11 East African Countries. A total weighted sample of 84,660 women who gave birth in the 5 years preceding each country's DHS survey and had ANC visits were included in this study. Data processing and analysis were performed using STATA 15 software. A multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression model was fitted to examine the association of educational attainment and ANC utilization. Variables with a p-value <0.05 were declared as significant factors associated with ANC utilization. Model comparison was done based on Akaike and Bayesian Information Criteria (AIC and BIC). RESULTS: The magnitude of optimal ANC utilization in East African Countries was 56.37% with 95% CI (56.03, 56.69) with the highest optimal ANC utilization in Zimbabwe (80.96%) and the lowest optimal ANC utilization in Rwanda (44.31%). Women who had higher education levels were more likely to have optimal ANC utilization, compared to those with no education (AOR = 2.34; 95 and CI; 2.11-2.59). Women who had media exposure were more likely to have optimal ANC utilization than those who have no media exposure (AOR = 1.07; 95% CI; 1.03, 1.10). CONCLUSION: Antenatal care utilization was low in East African countries. Educational attainment, maternal age, wealth index, birth order, media exposure, and living countries were factors associated with ANC utilization. Efforts to improve antenatal care and other maternal health service utilization in East Africa must take into account these factors. Specifically, working on the access to mass media by women may also improve antenatal care utilization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ijwh.s350510

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Jolivet, 2018, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 18, 1, 10.1186/s12884-018-1763-8 · DOI
  2. Jokhio, 2006, Lancet, 368, 2122, 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69854-1 · DOI
  3. Kuhnt, 2017, BMJ Open, 7, e017122, 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017122 · DOI
  4. Lincetto O, Mothebesoane-Anoh S, Gomez P, Munjanja S. Antenatal care. Opportunities for Africa’s newborns: practical data, policy and programmatic support for newborn care in Africa; 2006:55–62.
  5. Alvarez, 2009, BMC Public Health, 9, 1, 10.1186/1471-2458-9-462 · DOI
  6. Adewuyi, 2018, PLoS One, 13, e0197324, 10.1371/journal.pone.0197324 · DOI
  7. Kawungezi, 2015, Open J Prev Med, 5, 132, 10.4236/ojpm.2015.53016 · DOI
  8. Ali, 2018, Health Serv Res Managerial Epidemiol, 5, 2333392818781729, 10.1177/2333392818781729 · DOI
  9. Tessema, 2020, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 20, 1, 10.1186/s12884-020-2795-4 · DOI
  10. Atuhaire, 2020, Obstet Gynecol Int J, 11, 77, 10.15406/ogij.2020.11.00492 · DOI
  11. Ayalew, 2018, BMC Res Notes, 11, 1, 10.1186/s13104-018-3928-y · DOI
  12. Ousman, 2019, Front Public Health, 7, 161, 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00161 · DOI
  13. Nwosu, 2012, Niger J Med, 21, 196
  14. Cresswell, 2013, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 13, 1, 10.1186/1471-2393-13-103 · DOI
  15. Tsegaye, 2020, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 20, 1, 10.1186/s12884-020-03236-9 · DOI
  16. Yeneneh, 2018, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 18, 1, 10.1186/s12884-018-1874-2 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Okedo-Alex, 2019, BMJ Open, 9, e031890, 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031890 · DOI
  18. Yaya, 2017, PLoS One, 12, e0184934, 10.1371/journal.pone.0184934 · DOI
  19. Tiruaynet, 2019, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 19, 1, 10.1186/s12884-019-2259-x · DOI
  20. Shibre, 2020, BMC Public Health, 20, 1, 10.1186/s12889-020-09320-1 · DOI
  21. Halle-Ekane, 2014, Open J Obstet Gynecol, 4, 846, 10.4236/ojog.2014.414119 · DOI
  22. 2006, Guide to DHS Statistics
  23. Joshi, 2014, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 14, 1, 10.1186/1471-2393-14-94 · DOI
  24. Saad–Haddad, 2016, J Glob Health, 6, 10.7189/jogh.06.010404 · DOI
  25. Onasoga, 2012, Adv Appl Sci Res, 3, 1309
  26. Kabir, 2005, Trop Doct, 35, 110, 10.1258/0049475054036814 · DOI
  27. Tekelab, 2019, PLoS One, 14, e0214848, 10.1371/journal.pone.0214848 · DOI
  28. Manzi, 2014, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 14, 1, 10.1186/1471-2393-14-290 · DOI
  29. Påfs, 2015, Midwifery, 31, 1149, 10.1016/j.midw.2015.09.010 · DOI
  30. Basinga, 2012, Stud Fam Plann, 43, 11, 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00298.x · DOI
  31. Banda, 2017, Women Health, 57, 405, 10.1080/03630242.2016.1170092 · DOI
  32. Ragetlie, 2020, Sex Reprod Healthc, 23, 100482, 10.1016/j.srhc.2019.100482 · DOI
  33. Corroon, 2014, Matern Child Health J, 18, 307, 10.1007/s10995-013-1266-1 · DOI
  34. Dankwah, 2019, Reprod Health, 16, 1, 10.1186/s12978-019-0753-2 · DOI
  35. Finlayson, 2013, PLoS Med, 10, e1001373, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001373 · DOI
  36. Fatema, 2020, SSM Popul Health, 11, 100614, 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100614 · DOI
  37. Aliyu, 2017, Pan Afr Med J, 26, 124, 10.11604/pamj.2017.26.124.9861 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 81

Metadata

Authors
Raru, T. B., Ayana, G. M., Zakaria, H. F., & Merga, B. T.
Affiliations
Haramaya University (ET)
Corresponding author
Raru, Temam Beshir
Venue
International Journal of Women's Health
Published
2022-02
Volume
Volume 14
Pages
67-77
ISSN
1179-1411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210776967
Cited by
81
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10
FWCI
18.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Women s Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
antenatal care utilization, maternal education, pregnant women, East Africa, maternal health service utilization, media exposure, maternal age, wealth index, birth order, maternal mortality, neonatal mortality, sub-Saharan Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review