Cited by 84Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyAnesthesia and Pain Management

Prevalence, characteristics, and burden of failed back surgery syndrome: the influence of various residual symptoms on patient satisfaction and quality of life as assessed by a nationwide internet survey in Japan

Open access
Inoue, Shinsuke, Kamiya, Mitsuhiro, Nishihara, Makoto, Arai, Young-Chang P., Ikemoto, Tatsunori, Ushida, Takahiro·2017·Journal of Pain Research

Abstract

Abstract: We conducted a cross-sectional, Internet-based survey with a nationally representative sample of Japanese adults to assess the prevalence and characteristics of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Data regarding the residual symptoms and patient satisfaction from an online survey of 1842 lumbar surgery patients revealed the prevalence of FBSS to be 20.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.8–22.6). The prevalence of low back pain, dull ache, numbness, cold sensations, and paresthesia after surgery was 94.0%, 71.1%, 69.8%, 43.3%, and 35.3%, respectively. With a logistic regression model, severe residual low back pain (numerical rating scale 8–10), higher pain intensity, and multiple low back surgeries were strongly associated with FBSS, with odds ratios of 15.21 (95% CI, 7.79–29.7), 1.40 (95% CI, 1.32–1.49), and 1.87 (95% CI, 1.25–2.81), respectively. Respondents with FBSS had significantly lower EuroQol-5D ( P <0.001) values and significantly higher scores on the Kessler six-item psychological distress scale ( P <0.001), compared with the non-FBSS group. Our findings indicate that residual sensations have a significant effect on patient quality of life, similar to that of chronic low back pain. Precise presurgical provision of prognoses based on comprehensive epidemiologic data, as well as scrupulous attention to patient satisfaction and clinical progress may help reduce the incidence of FBSS. Keywords: failed back surgery syndrome, patient satisfaction, prevalence, residual symptom, numbness

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/jpr.s129295

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • About 20-30% of spinal surgery patients do not experience long-term improvement in pain relief after surgery.

    “In addition, about 20–30% of spinal surgery patients do not experience (long-term) improvement in pain relief after surgery”

    From Strength Back – A qualitative study on the co-creation of a positive psychology digital health intervention for spinal surgery patients (2023) · cites this paper as Inoue et al., 2017

    The Results (Prevalence of FBSS; page not provided) report a 20.6% rate of failed back surgery syndrome, measured an average of 3.4 years after low-back surgery. But the paper defines that outcome as dissatisfaction plus at least one unpleasant residual sensation, not a lack of improvement in pain relief. It therefore does not establish that 20–30% experienced no long-term pain improvement. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Oaklander AL North RB Failed Back Surgery Syndrome 4th ed Philadelphia, PA Lippincott Williams & Williams 2010
  2. [22]Stambough JL Matching patient and physician expectations in spine surgery leads to improved outcomes Spine J 2001 1 3 234 14588356

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inoue, S., Kamiya, M., Nishihara, M., Arai, Y.-C. P., Ikemoto, T., & Ushida, T.
Affiliations
Aichi Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Inoue, Shinsuke
Venue
Journal of Pain Research
Published
2017-04
Volume
Volume 10
Pages
811-823
ISSN
1178-7090 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2605205719
Cited by
84
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K10262)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
failed back surgery syndrome, lumbar spine surgery, numbness, paresthesia, patient satisfaction, quality of life, psychological distress, prevalence, Japan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review