The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: Pseudomonas aeruginosa has great intrinsic antimicrobial resistance limiting the number of effective antibiotics. Thus, other antimicrobial agents such as silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are considered potential agents to help manage and prevent infections. AgNPs can be used in several applications against bacteria resistant to common antibiotics or even multiresistant bacteria such as P. aeruginosa . This study assessed the antimicrobial activity of commercial 10 nm AgNPs on two hospital strains of P. aeruginosa resistant to a large number of antibiotics and a reference strain from a culture collection. All strains were susceptible to 5 µg/mL nanoparticles solution. Reference strains INCQS 0230 and P.a.1 were sensitive to AgNPs at concentrations of 1.25 and 0.156 µg/mL, respectively; however, this was not observed for hospital strain P.a.2, which was more resistant to all antibiotics and AgNPs tested. Cytotoxicity evaluation indicated that AgNPs, up to a concentration of 2.5 µg/mL, are very safe for all cell lines tested. At 5.0 µg/mL, AgNPs had a discrete cytotoxic effect on tumor cells HeLa and HepG2. Results showed the potential of using AgNPs as an alternative to conventional antimicrobial agents that are currently used, and a perspective for application of nanosilver with antibiotics to enhance antimicrobial activity. Keywords: antimicrobial activity, bacterial resistance, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , silver nanoparticles, AgNPs
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Cited by
Silver nanoparticles: Synthesis, medical applications and biosafety
Xu, L., Wang, Y.-Y., Huang, J., Chen, C.-Y., Wang, Z.-X., & Xie, H. (2020) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.45413 · Cited by 1,315
A review on inkjet printing of nanoparticle inks for flexible electronics
Nayak, L., Mohanty, S., Nayak, S. K., & Ramadoss, A. (2019) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c9tc01630a · Cited by 497
Mutuku, C., Gazdag, Z., & Melegh, S. (2022) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-022-03334-0 · Cited by 280
A mini review on plant-mediated zinc oxide nanoparticles and their antibacterial potency
Kavitha, A., Doss, A., Praveen Pole, R. P., Pushpa Rani, T. P. K., Prasad, R., & Satheesh, S. (2023) · Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102654 · Cited by 74
Siddiqui, S. I., Fatima, B., Tara, N., Rathi, G., & Chaudhry, S. A. (2019) · The Impact and Prospects of Green Chemistry for Textile Technology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-102491-1.00015-0 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Salomoni, R., Léo, P., Montemor, A., Rinaldi, B., & Rodrigues, M.
- Venue
- Nanotechnology, Science and Applications
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- Volume 10
- Pages
- 115-121
- ISSN
- 1177-8903 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2726907595
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2147/nsa.s133415
- The paper
- Salomoni, R., Léo, P., Montemor, A., Rinaldi, B., & Rodrigues, M. (2017). Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nanotechnology, Science and Applications. https://doi.org/10.2147/nsa.s133415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.