Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 29Corneal surgery and disordersOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesOcular Infections and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LASIK and PRK in hyperopic astigmatic eyes: is early retreatment advisable?

Open access
Frings, Andreas, Richard, Gisbert, Steinberg, Johannes, Linke, Stephan, Katz, Toam, Druchkiv, Vasyl·2016·Clinical Ophthalmology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the refractive and keratometric stability in hyperopic astigmatic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) during the first 6 months after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 97 hyperopic eyes; 55 were treated with LASIK and 42 with PRK. Excimer ablation for all eyes was performed using the ALLEGRETTO excimer laser platform using a mitomycin C for PRK and a mechanical microkeratome for LASIK. Keratometric and refractive data were analyzed during three consecutive follow-up intervals (6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months). The corneal topography was obtained using Scheimpflug topography, and subjective refractions were acquired by expert optometrists according to a standardized protocol. RESULTS: After 3 months, mean keratometry and spherical equivalent were stable after LASIK, whereas PRK-treated eyes presented statistically significant (P<0.001) regression of hyperopia. In eleven cases, hyperopic regression of >1 D occurred. The optical zone diameter did not correlate with the development of regression. CONCLUSION: After corneal laser refractive surgery, keratometric changes are followed by refractive changes and they occur up to 6 months after LASIK and for at least 6 months after PRK, and therefore, caution should be applied when retreatment is planned during the 1st year after surgery because hyperopic refractive regression can lead to suboptimal visual outcome. Keratometric and refractive stability is earlier achieved after LASIK, and therefore, retreatment may be independent of late regression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/opth.s99098

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Progression of Km and SE (in D) within the first 6 months after surgery (6-week, 3-month, and 6-month FU). Notes: (A) after LASIK, (B) after PRK, and (C) absolute change in Km and SE. Abbreviations: Km, mean keratometry; SE, spherical equivalent; FU, follow-up; LASIK, laser in situ keratomileusis; PRK, photorefractive keratectomy, SD; standard deviation.
Figure 1 Progression of Km and SE (in D) within the first 6 months after surgery (6-week, 3-month, and 6-month FU). Notes: (A) after LASIK, (B) after PRK, and (C) absolute change in Km and SE. Abbreviations: Km, mean keratometry; SE, spherical equivalent; FU, follow-up; LASIK, laser in situ keratomileusis; PRK, photorefractive keratectomy, SD; standard deviation.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Kanellopoulos J Asimellis G Longitudinal postoperative lasik epithelial thickness profile changes in correlation with degree of myopia correction J Refract Surg 2014 30 166 171 24576651

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Frings, A., Richard, G., Steinberg, J., Linke, S., Katz, T., & Druchkiv, V.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Venue
Clinical Ophthalmology
Published
2016-03
Volume
10
Pages
565
ISSN
  • 1177-5467 (ISSN-L)
  • 1177-5483
OpenAlex
W2327730217
Cited by
29
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical ophthalmology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
Keywords
LASIK, photorefractive keratectomy, hyperopic astigmatism, refractive stability, retreatment, excimer laser ablation, mitomycin C, optical zone diameter, corneal topography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.