Democracia electoral en Colombia desde una visión de competencia
Open accessAbstract
El presente artículo pretende exponer el funcionamiento de la democracia electoral en Colombia, desde la teoría competitiva de John Schumpeter. A partir del acontecer histórico nacional se pretende comprender cuál es el impacto y qué significa el proceso de elecciones en esta sociedad. Como la intención es comprender cómo se ha desarrollado la democracia en Colombia, es necesario definir en un primer momento los conceptos claves para entender qué es democracia, específicamente la electoral y competitiva. A continuación, analizar el comportamiento electoral en Colombia, a través de datos cuantitativos y cualitativos sobre las últimas elecciones, respecto a temas como legitimidad, valor y abstencionismo; variables que permitirán identificar cuáles son las principales debilidades para la democracia en el país. Con la intención de aplicar el alcance teórico, se hará un breve análisis acerca del comportamiento político en Bogotá, como capital del país y como centro del movimiento político nacional, esto permitirá alcanzar una comprensión valiosa sobre la democracia en Colombia.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This situation further fragments society and can be a catalyst or justification for symbolic or physical violence.
“This situation further fragments society and, in some cases, can be a catalyst or justification for forms of symbolic or physical violence”
From La ideología política, las creencias sociales y la polarización como obstáculos psicosociales para la democracia y la paz en Colombia, 2016-2020 (2024) · cites this paper as Hernández Díaz & Echeverri Martínez, 2018
The “Desconfianza y Falta de legitimidad” section reports fragmentation of opinions and evident polarization. The “Violencia” section says that, in this polarized context, expressing a voting intention or political ideology can lead to violent acts. Neither passage establishes that the unspecified situation further fragments society or justifies violence, and the paper does not distinguish symbolic from physical violence. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThese emotions may cause distancing between individuals, influencing thought and action unreflectively, which may give rise to soft fanaticism during electoral periods and in daily life.
“These emotions may cause distancing between individuals, influencing thought and action in an unreflective manner that may give rise to soft fanaticism, both during electoral periods and in daily life.”
From La ideología política, las creencias sociales y la polarización como obstáculos psicosociales para la democracia y la paz en Colombia, 2016-2020 (2024) · cites this paper as Hernández Díaz & Echeverri Martínez, 2018
The Abstencionismo section says emotions can polarize people’s views, and Definiendo la democracia says emotion can displace rational judgment in electoral choices. The copy does not describe this as “soft fanaticism” or extend it to daily life outside politics. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIntensification of certain political emotions (indignation, hatred, rage, resentment, anger, fear) is associated with polarization processes.
“Other researchers concur with this perspective, stating that the intensification of certain political emotions (indignation, hatred, rage, resentment, anger, fear, among others) is associated with polarization processes.”
From La ideología política, las creencias sociales y la polarización como obstáculos psicosociales para la democracia y la paz en Colombia, 2016-2020 (2024) · cites this paper as Hernández Díaz & Echeverri Martínez, 2018
The Abstencionismo section says that emotionality can polarize people's political preferences, supporting the general link between emotion and polarization. It does not say that intensifying emotions drives polarization or identify the claimed emotions as a group; the Violencia section mentions fear but does not make that specific connection. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Bovero, M. (2012). ¿Elecciones sin democracia? ¿Democracia sin elecciones? Sobre las formas de participación política. Revista Justicia Electoral, 1(10), 317 -351.
- Gil Carbó, E. (1997). La teoría competitiva de la democracia: Max Weber -J. Schumpeter: Un estudio comparado. Agenda Internacional, 4(8), 37-47.
- Madrigal Garzón, A. E. (2011). La formación del estado-nación en en Colombia durante el siglo XIX: El tratado histórico-social de la institución del orden político. Perspecti- vas Internacionales, 7(1), 219 -235.
- Ochoa Villa, R. (2015). Comportamiento electoral de los colombianos durante las eleccio- nes presidenciales del año 2010. Jurídicas CUC, 11(1), 209-220.
- Ramírez, M. F. (2011). Gobernanza y legitimidad política. Reflexión Política, 13(25), 124-135.
- Rivera Aya, E. N., & Suárez Báez, L. C. (2017). Algunas percepciones y conductas de los electores sobre la comunicación política y el marketing político. Análisis, 49(91), 405-437.
- Rodríguez Arechavaleta, C. M. (2007). Redefiniendo la democracia. Los orígenes de la de- mocracia competitiva: J. Schumpeter. Iberófum: Revista de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Iberoamericana, 2 (3), 1 -15.
- Rúa Delgado, C. (2013). La legitimidad en el ejercicio del poder político en el Estado Social de Derecho. Una revisión desde el caso colombiano. Revista Ius et Praxis, 19(2), 85-122.
- Sartori, G. (1991). Democracia. Revist de Ciencia Política, 13(1), 117 -151.
- Sen, A. (1998). El valor universal de la democracia. Themis, 47(1), 277 -286.
- Vidal de la Rosa, G. (2010). Teoría democrática: Joseph Schumpeter y la síntesis moderna. Nueva Época, 23(62), 177-199.
- Authors
- Hernandez Díaz, J. C., & Echeverri Martínez, L. M.
- Venue
- El Ágora USB
- Publisher
- Universidad de San Buenaventura
- Published
- 2018-07-28
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 496-511
- ISSN
- 1657-8031 (ISSN-L)
- 2665-3354
- OpenAlex
- W2901436462
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- El Ágora USB (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Dynamics in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- electoral democracy, competitive democracy, voting behavior, electoral abstention, political legitimacy, Colombian elections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
