Effects of Edmodo-Assisted Process Writing with the Problematized Scaffolding on the Quality of Students’ Writing
Open accessAbstract
This research explored the effects of Edmodo-assisted process writing with the problematized scaffolding on the quality of students’ writing. Quasi-Experimental research with one-group pre-posttest was utilized as the research design. The subjects of this research were the second-semester students of the English Department at the Islamic University of Darul ‘Ulum, Lamongan. There were 13 students in the class, and all of them took part in this research. In every seven meetings, they were receiving writing instruction using traditional and Edmodo-assisted process writing with problematized scaffolding respectively. To collect the data, pre-and-posttest were conducted to both class conditions. An interview was also done in the experimental class to capture the students’ perception after the implementation of Edmodo. Dependent and independent t-tests were utilized to analyze the data collected. The interview was analyzed qualitatively to support the findings. Results of the analysis indicate that the use of Edmodo-assisted process writing with problematized scaffolding significantly improves the students’ writing skills and that the students’ score improvement is significantly higher than in the traditional class. Therefore, the usage of this media is highly recommended.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Well-aligned scaffolding can significantly enhance writing proficiency.
“Collectively, this body of work demonstrates that well-aligned scaffolding can significantly enhance writing proficiency.”
From Shaping Human-AI Collaboration: Varied Scaffolding Levels in Co-writing with Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · cited 1× · see citing works
“According to Flavell (1979), metacognition refers to knowledge about the regulation of self-cognition activities in the learning process.”
BackgroundTeaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy
Lander, J., & Brown, H. (1995) · Language · doi:10.2307/415773 · Cited by 7,900 · see citing works
Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy
Frazier, S., & Brown, H. D. (2001) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587655 · Cited by 6,250 · see citing works
Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices
Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2003) · Cited by 2,975 · see citing works
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (1982) · Cited by 538 · see citing works
The process writing approach: a meta-analysis
Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.488703 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Agents of Integration: Understanding Transfer as a Rhetorical Act
Nowacek, R. S. (2011) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 234 · see citing works
A Study on the Metacognitive Awareness of Secondary School Students
Jaleel, S., & Dr. Premachandran, P. (2016) · Universal Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.13189/ujer.2016.040121 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Students' Perceptions of Edmodo and Mobile Learning and their Real Barriers towards them
Al-Said, K. M. (2015) · The turkish online journal of educational technology · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Al-Harbi, S. S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. A. (2016) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v9n10p60 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Al-Kathiri, F. (2014) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v8n1p189 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
New Paradigm for Re-engineering Education: Globalization, Localization and Individualization
Cheng, Y. C. (2005) · Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3620-5 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
The Teaching of EFL Writing in Indonesia
Ariyanti, A. (2016) · DINAMIKA ILMU · doi:10.21093/di.v16i2.274 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Scaffolding EFL Students' Writing through the Writing Process Approach.
Faraj, A. K. A. (2015) · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Dynamic scaffolding of socially regulated learning in a computer-based learning environment
Molenaar, I., Roda, C., van Boxtel, C., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.006 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Scaffolding of small groups’ metacognitive activities with an avatar
Molenaar, I., Chiu, M. M., Sleegers, P. J. C., & van Boxtel, C. (2011) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9130-z · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Stewart, G., Seifert, T. A., & Rolheiser, C. (2015) · The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.1.4 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Facilitating metacognitive processes of academic genre-based writing using an online writing system
Yeh, H. (2014) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.881384 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Promoting Students' Paragraph Writing Using EDMODO: An Action Research.
Al-Naibi, I. S., Al-Jabri, M., & Al-Kalbani, I. (2018) · The turkish online journal of educational technology · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Mokhtar, F. A. (2016) · Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.52380/mojet.2016.4.2.79 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Metacognition: Transforming the Learning Experience.
Chekwa, E., McFadden, M., Divine, A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Learning in Higher Education · Cited by 28 · see citing works
VanKooten, C. (2016) · Composition Forum · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Improving Process Writing with the Use Authentic Assessment
Aziz, M. N. B. A., & Yusoff, N. M. (2016) · International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · doi:10.11591/ijere.v5i3.4539 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Jafarigohar, M., & Mortazavi, M. (2016) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2016.1154488 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Content Area Teacher Candidates' Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Teaching Writing Online
Saine, P., & West, J. A. (2017) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2017.1280433 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Research Trends in EFL Writing in Indonesia: Where Art Thou?
Masduqi, H. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13297772 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Digital self-review and anonymous peer feedback in Turkish high school EFL writing
Kayacan, A., & Razı, S. (2017) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Promoting Academic Writing Students’ Skills through “Process Writing” Strategy
Listyani (2018) · Advances in Language and Literary Studies · doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.173 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The Effects Of A Social Learning Network On Students' Performances And Attitudes
Durak, G., Cankay, S., Yünkül, E., et al. (2017) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.292951 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
THE EFFECTS OF A SOCIAL LEARNING NETWORK ON STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCES AND ATTITUDES
Durak, G., Çankaya, S., Yünkül, E., & Öztürk, G. (2017) · Open Access Publishing Group - European Journal of Education Studies · doi:10.46827/ejes.v0i0.530 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Promoting Metacognition in EFL Classrooms through Scaffolding Motivation
Jafarigohar, M., & Mortazavi, M. (2016) · Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.18869/acadpub.ijal.19.1.73 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shaping Human-AI Collaboration: Varied Scaffolding Levels in Co-writing with Language Models
Dhillon, P. S., Molaei, S., Li, J., Golub, M., Zheng, S., & Robert, L. P. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642134 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sumarno, W. K.
- Affiliations
- Darul Ulum Islamic University (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Sumarno, Wahyu Kyestiati
- Venue
- Lingua Cultura
- Publisher
- Universitas Bina Nusantara
- Published
- 2019-02-20
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-37
- ISSN
- 1978-8118 (ISSN-L)
- 2460-710X
- OpenAlex
- W2951376406
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- Lingua Cultura (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Binus Journal (Binus University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Keywords
- Edmodo, process writing, writing instruction, writing quality, English as a foreign language, EFL writing skills, educational technology, student perceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
