CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 146Artificial Intelligence in EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the ethical considerations of using Chat GPT in university education

Open access
Huallpa, et al., Jorge Jinchuña·2023·Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN)
DOI 10.21533/pen.v11i4.3770
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study investigates the moral dilemmas that arise with incorporating Chat GPT into higher education, with a focus on the situation in Latinoamerican institutions of higher learning. The study surveyed 220 people via online questionnaire to learn more about their experiences with and motivations for using AI-powered conversational agents. An overview of the demographics of the participants was provided through descriptive statistics. This investigation of the subject at hand lays the groundwork for further research. It also reveals the hidden meanings of the observed phenomena, and it suggests possible solutions to the problems that have been uncovered. This research looks at how AI systems and chatbots can supplement human knowledge and judgment, as well as their potential drawbacks. The results showed that participants thought Chat GPT integration was moderately accessible and had moderately positive social attitudes. They understood the value and responsibility of Chat GPT in creating individualized educational opportunities. Participants stressed the necessity for explicit institutional standards regarding privacy and data security. Gender, age, sense of accessibility, social attitude, opinions, and personal experience, privacy and data security, institutional guidelines, and individualized learning were also found to affect participants' reliance on AI through regression analysis. The findings shed light on how the integration of Chat GPT into Latinoamerican higher education is complicated by factors such as individual beliefs, cultural norms, and ethical problems. The busy schedules of students may be accommodated and the resources they need to succeed can be made available thanks to this adaptability. In addition, natural language processing models can offer students instantaneous help via text chat, voice, or video. To fully grasp the ethical consequences and lead the creation of responsible implementation techniques, the research proposes that additional qualitative investigations, longitudinal studies, and comparative research across diverse contexts is required. Closing these knowledge gaps will help move the conversational AI field forward in ways that are ethical and beneficial to the classroom.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21533/pen.v11i4.3770

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. S. A. S. Muñoz, G. G. Gayoso, A. C. Huambo, R. D. C. Tapia, J. L. Incaluque, and O. E. P. Aguila, "Examining the impacts of ChatGPT on student motivation and engagement," Przestrzen Spoleczna, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-27, 2023.
  2. E. B. R. Mansilla, R. Y. Castillo-Acobo, E. G. M. Puma, Y. M. Maquera, J. L. A. Gonzales, and M. J. Vasquez-Pauca, "Stress in university teachers in the framework of the post-pandemic face-to-face academic resumption," Journal of Medicinal and Chemical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1040-1047, 2022.
  3. W. R. M. Ramos et al., "Responsible leadership: A comparative study between Latinoamerican national and private universities," Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, no. 99, pp. 143-154, 2022.
  4. J. C. Orosco Gavilán, D. Zapana Díaz, J. Jinchuña Huallpa, J. L. Bustinza Cabala, O. E. Pongo Aguila, and E. G. Martínez Puma, "Technological social responsibility in university professors," Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, no. 100, 2022.
  5. B. Rathore, "Future of AI & generation alpha: ChatGPT beyond boundaries," EIPRMJ, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 63-68, 2023.
  6. A. H. M. Alaidi, and F. T. Abed, "Attendance System Design And Implementation Based On Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) And Arduino," Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical Control Systems, vol. 10, no. SI4, pp. 1342-1347, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–146 of 146

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Huallpa, E. A.
Corresponding author
Huallpa, et al., Jorge Jinchuña
Venue
Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN)
Publisher
International University of Sarajevo
Published
2023-08-30
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
105
ISSN
2303-4521 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.21533/pen.v11i4.3770
OpenAlex
W4395099925
Cited by
145
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 10
FWCI
34.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (International University of Sarajevo) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
ChatGPT, artificial intelligence in higher education, ethical considerations, chatbots, student attitudes toward AI, privacy and data security, institutional guidelines, personalized learning, AI reliance, gender and age differences, responsible AI deployment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review