Practitioners’ Corner ∙ Anonymisation and Re-Identification Risk for Voice Data
Open accessAbstract
International audience
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Preventing re-identification of individuals minimizes risk of data breaches.
“Minimizes risk of data breaches”
From AI Fairness in Data Management and Analytics: A Review on Challenges, Methodologies and Applications (2023) · cites this paper as [242]
Preventing re-identification of individuals has challenges in preserving data utility.
“Challenges in preserving data utility”
From AI Fairness in Data Management and Analytics: A Review on Challenges, Methodologies and Applications (2023) · cites this paper as [242]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mark James Elliot et al, 'Functional anonymisation: Personal data and the data environment' (2018) Computer Law & Security Review.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI Fairness in Data Management and Analytics: A Review on Challenges, Methodologies and Applications
Chen, P., Wu, L., & Wang, L. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app131810258 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Stark, B. C., Bryant, L., Themistocleous, C. K., den Ouden, D., & Roberts, A. (2022) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2022.2039372 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
A comprehensive introspection on AI risks: taxonomy, challenges, and future directions
Ray, P. P. (2026) · Iran Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42044-025-00370-5 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
A Practical Guide to WhatsApp Data in Social Science Research
Kohne, J., Elhai, J. D., & Montag, C. (2022) · Studies in neuroscience, psychology and behavioral economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98546-2_11 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
ChatDashboard: A Framework to collect, link, and process donated WhatsApp Chat Log Data
Kohne, J., & Montag, C. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02276-1 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Gallois, H., Ivković, L., Evangelista, E., Bensoussan, Y., Dorr, D., Elemento, O., Ghosh, S., Johnson, A., Payne, P. R. O., Powell, M. E., et al. (2025) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10728-025-00539-w · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Doğan, F. S., Mestari, S. Z. E., & Botes, M. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74630-7_27 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Tilgang til helseopplysninger i maskinlæringsprosjekter
Hauglid, M. K., & Mikalsen, K. Ø. (2022) · Lov og Rett · doi:10.18261/lor.61.7.3
- Authors
- Moretón, A., & Jaramillo, A.
- Venue
- European Data Protection Law Review
- Publisher
- Lexxion Verlag
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 274-284
- ISSN
- 2364-2831 (ISSN-L)
- 2364-284X
- OpenAlex
- W3182664908
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Data Protection Law Review (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Commission (825081, HORIZON2020)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- voice data, data anonymization, re-identification risk, data protection, personal data, voice biometrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
