Intuitive Interaction and Older People
Open accessAbstract
Older people often struggle with using contemporary products and interfaces. They show slower, less intuitive interaction with more errors. This paper reports on a large project designed to investigate why older people have these difficulties and what strategies could be used to mitigate them. The project team found that older people are less familiar with products that they own than younger ones, while both older and middle aged people are less familiar with products that they do not own than younger ones. Age-related cognitive decline is also related to slower and less intuitive performance with contemporary products and interfaces. Therefore, the reasons behind the problems that older people demonstrate with contemporary technologies involve a mix of familiarity and capability. Redundancy applied to an interface in the form of symbols and words is helpful for middle aged and younger old people but the oldest age group performed better with a words only interface. Also, older people showed faster and more intuitive use with a flat interface than a nested one, although there was no difference in errors. Further work is ongoing in order to establish ways in which these findings can be usefully applied in the design process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The redundancy approach was less effective for the oldest age group (73+), showing faster task times and better intuitiveness only for middle-aged people (40-59).
“The redundancy approach was shown as less effective for the oldest age group (73+), showing faster task times and better intuitiveness only for middle aged people (40-59).”
From Intuitive Learnability of Touch Gestures for Technology-Naive Older Adults (2015) · cites this paper as Blackler et al., 2012
In the simplicity approach, older people took less time to complete the task in an interface with a flat structure than in an interface with a nested structure.
“In the simplicity approach, older people took less time to complete the task in an interface that used a flat structure when compared with an interface with a nested structure.”
From Intuitive Learnability of Touch Gestures for Technology-Naive Older Adults (2015) · cites this paper as Blackler et al., 2012
Cites
Age-Related Impairment in Executive Functioning: Updating, Inhibition, Shifting, and Access
Fisk, J. E., & Sharp, C. A. (2004) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803390490510680 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intuitive Learnability of Touch Gestures for Technology-Naive Older Adults
Mihajlov, M., Law, E. L.-C., & Springett, M. (2015) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwu044 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Blackler, A., Popovic, V., Mahar, D., Reddy, G. R., & Lawry, S.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Queensland University of Technology
- ORCID
- Blackler, Alethea
- Venue
- Proceedings of DRS
- Publisher
- Design Research Society
- Published
- 2012-07-01
- ISSN
- 2398-3132 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W171754148
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of DRS (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- older adults, intuitive interaction, age-related cognitive decline, product familiarity, interface design, redundancy, flat interface, usability, age differences in technology use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review