The Relationship Between Managerial Power and Transformational Leadership
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates the relation between Managerial Power (Coercive power, Reward power, Legitimate power, Expert power, and Referent power) and Transformational leadership (Idealized Influence, Inspirational Motivation, Intellectual Stimulation and Individualized Consideration). The topics of Transformational leadership and Managerial power have attracted considerable interest from both practitioners and academics in recent years This research aims to identify this relation in the Egyptian environment, and to highlight the main factors influencing Egyptian employees. For collecting data a questionnaire was used, 211 employees from different occupations responded, different age groups and different work levels were investigated. Hypotheses were tested and analyzed by means of a correlation analysis and a mean differences. It was found that Intellectual Stimulation is the most important Transformational leadership feature in Egypt and all of the features of Transformational Leadership have a positive relation with Managerial Power in the Egyptian environment. Findings of this research provide theoretical and practical implications for researchers. تبحث هذه الدراسة في العلاقة بين القوة الإدارية (القوة القسرية ، قوة المکافأة ، القوة الشرعية ، قوة الخبراء ، وقوة الإحالة) والقيادة التحويلية (التأثير المثالي ، الدافع الملهم التحفيز الفکري والاعتبار الفردي)اجتذبت موضوعات القيادة التحويلية والقوة الإدارية اهتمامًا کبيرًا من کل من الممارسين والأکاديميين في السنوات الأخيرة. ويهدف البحث إلى تحديد هذه العلاقة في البيئة المصرية ، وتسليط الضوء على العوامل الرئيسية التي تؤثر على الموظفين المصريين. تم استخدام الاستبيان لجمع البيانات. استجاب 211 موظفًا من مختلف المهن ، وتم التحقيق في الفئات العمرية المختلفة ومستويات العمل المختلفة. تم اختبار الفرضيات وتحليلها عن طريق تحليل الارتباط وفروق المتوسط. لقد وجد أن التحفيز الفکري هو أهم سمة للقيادة التحويلية في مصر وجميع سمات القيادة التحويلية لها علاقة إيجابية بالقوة الإدارية في البيئة المصرية. تقدم نتائج هذا البحث آثارًا نظرية وعملية للباحثين.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 2
- Authors
- I. SHAHIN, A.
- Venue
- المجلة العلمیة للدراسات التجاریة والبیئیة
- Published
- 2021-10-15
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 477-509
- ISSN
- 2090-3782 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4212781308
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- ar
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- المجلة العلمية للدراسات التجارية والبيئية (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Keywords
- managerial power, transformational leadership, coercive power, reward power, legitimate power, expert power, referent power, intellectual stimulation, idealized influence, inspirational motivation, individualized consideration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
