The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Moringa Leaves Powder (Moringa oleifera) on Some Chemical and Physical Properties of Pan Bread
Abstract
The current study was a trial to produce an acceptable herbal bakery product such pan bread using Moringa leaves powder at different ratios, (5, 10, 15 and 20%). Chemical composition, and minerals content of raw materials and processed pan bread samples were determined. Rheological characteristics of these treated dough, sensory evaluation, physical properties, staling rate and microstructure of processed pan bread samples were conducted. The obtained results indicated that Moringa leaves powder contained high amounts of protein and crude fiber, beside some essential minerals namely Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphorous and Iron. Addition of Moringaleaves powder to pan bread raised the protein content up to 21.85%, ash (5.21%) and carbohydrates content decreased and reached 59.34%. Treated pan bread with 10% Moringaleaves powder had higher amount of Magnesium (Mg), Calcium (Ca) and Iron (Fe) compared with control sample (from 25.50 to 102.56 mg/100g, 12.85 to 205.60 mg/100g and 4.54 to 12.56 mg/100g, respectively). Rheological properties showed that addition of Moringa leaves powder negatively affected on some farinograph and extensograph values. Sensory evaluation showed that although there was an improvement in nutritional value, the acceptability of all pan bread samples decreased with increasing level of Moringaleaves powder ratios, especially pan bread with 15 and 20%. As physical properties, baking loss % ranged from 3.5-5.5% in bread sample E and control sample, respectively…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Also, El-Gammal et al. (2016) and Sengev et al. (2013) agree with this finding.”
From Utilization of Unwanted Weed, Paragis Leaves (Eleusine indica Linn.) in Cookie Production (2020) · cites this paper as El-Gammal et al. (2016)
In the citing paper
“Not only in cookies, El-Gammal et al. (2016) observed that crust and crumb color scores of pan bread decreased with increasing moringa leaves powder.”
From Utilization of Unwanted Weed, Paragis Leaves (Eleusine indica Linn.) in Cookie Production (2020) · cites this paper as El-Gammal et al. (2016)
Citations
Cites
Influence of hydrocolloids on dough rheology and bread quality
Rosell, C. M., Rojas, J. A., & Benedito de Barber, C. (2001) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/s0268-005x(00)00054-0 · Cited by 866
Sengev, A. I., Abu, J. O., & Gernah, D. I. (2013) · Food and Nutrition Sciences · doi:10.4236/fns.2013.43036 · Cited by 91
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Utilization of Unwanted Weed, Paragis Leaves (Eleusine indica Linn.) in Cookie Production
Department of Food Science and Technology, V. S. U., Makinano, D., & Cimafranca, L. (2020) · Central Mindanao University Journal of Science · doi:10.52751/qhho9684 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- El-Gammal, R., Ghoneim, G., & ElShehawy, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences
- Published
- 2016-07-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 307-314
- ISSN
- 2090-3731
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review