Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Moringa Leaves Powder (Moringa oleifera) on Some Chemical and Physical Properties of Pan Bread

El-Gammal, Rania, Ghoneim, Gehan, ElShehawy, Sh.·2016·Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences

Abstract

The current study was a trial to produce an acceptable herbal bakery product such pan bread using Moringa leaves powder at different ratios, (5, 10, 15 and 20%). Chemical composition, and minerals content of raw materials and processed pan bread samples were determined. Rheological characteristics of these treated dough, sensory evaluation, physical properties, staling rate and microstructure of processed pan bread samples were conducted. The obtained results indicated that Moringa leaves powder contained high amounts of protein and crude fiber, beside some essential minerals namely Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphorous and Iron. Addition of Moringaleaves powder to pan bread raised the protein content up to 21.85%, ash (5.21%) and carbohydrates content decreased and reached 59.34%. Treated pan bread with 10% Moringaleaves powder had higher amount of Magnesium (Mg), Calcium (Ca) and Iron (Fe) compared with control sample (from 25.50 to 102.56 mg/100g, 12.85 to 205.60 mg/100g and 4.54 to 12.56 mg/100g, respectively). Rheological properties showed that addition of Moringa leaves powder negatively affected on some farinograph and extensograph values. Sensory evaluation showed that although there was an improvement in nutritional value, the acceptability of all pan bread samples decreased with increasing level of Moringaleaves powder ratios, especially pan bread with 15 and 20%. As physical properties, baking loss % ranged from 3.5-5.5% in bread sample E and control sample, respectively…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21608/jfds.2016.46005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
El-Gammal, R., Ghoneim, G., & ElShehawy, S.
Venue
Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
307-314
ISSN
2090-3731
Cited by
25
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review