Team-based learning as an inspiring tool for teaching Parasitology in the integrated curricula
Open accessAbstract
Background: Most medical colleges all over the world shifted to programs adopting integrated student-centered curricula. Team-based learning (TBL) is a novel learning tool to benefit from self-directed learning at home and team learning in class. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and the students' perceptions of TBL for learning Parasitology. Subjects and methods: This study addressed the 2nd year medical students of phase I at the College of Medicine, University of Bisha (UBCOM), Saudi Arabia of 2 batches; batch (2020-2021, n=80) studied 3 topics of Medical Parasitology through traditional lectures (TL), and batch (2021-2022, n=81) studied the same topics illustrated by the same tutor through TBL. The study compared between marks of students (2021-2022) achieved in the individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) and team readiness assurance test (tRAT) through the TBL activities. It also compares students’ marks of the 2 batches in the selected repeated MCQs in the final course exam. A survey was designed to measure students’ perceptions of TBL. Results: There was a significant increase (P< 0.001) in the mean ± SD of the marks in tRAT compared to iRAT for TBL-learned students and also in the final course marks for the questions touching the Parasitology topics among students of the concerned batches. Regarding the perception of TBL, students agreed that pre-class study positively affected their performance in iRAT and tRAT (60%, and 66.6%, respectively). TBL was reported as an effective tool that supports understanding of Parasitology (85%), communication skills (68.4%), dealing with innovative technology (58.4%), the learning competencies of medical students (53.3%), learning Parasitology curricula (56.7%), and engagement (60%). Shortage of pre-class time (28.3%) was the main challenge. Conclusion: Group learning is more beneficial than individual learning since it is a more effective tool for learning than traditional lectures although it has several challenges.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The TBL content was conducted according to the standards of TBL conduction [29].
“The TBL content was a single anatomical topic and was conducted according to the standards of TBL conduction [29].”
From AI in medical education: uses of AI in construction type A MCQs (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI in medical education: uses of AI in construction type A MCQs
Rezigalla, A. A. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05250-3 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“TBL comprises three parts: pre-class, in-class, and post-class [29, 30].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSalih, K. M. A., Alfaifi, J. A., Alamri, M. M. S., Mohammed, O. A., Khan, S. M., Marakala, V., Mohammed, N. A., Mohamed, S. E., Hashish, A. A., Sonpol, H. M. A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jtumed.2024.05.003 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- El-Ashkar, A., Aboregela, A., Alam-Eldin, Y., & Metwally, A.
- Affiliations
- Ain Shams University (EG)
- Zagazig University (EG)
- Venue
- Parasitologists United Journal
- Published
- 2023-04-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-72
- ISSN
- 1687-7942 (ISSN-L)
- 2090-2646
- OpenAlex
- W4366830110
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Parasitologists United Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biomedical and Engineering Education
- Keywords
- team-based learning, curriculum integration, student-centered learning, readiness assurance test, medical students, student perceptions, group learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review