Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Chronic Stress on Penile Corpus Cavernosum of Rats

De Souza, Diogo B., Silva, Dilson, Cortez, Celia M., Costa, Waldemar S., Sampaio, Francisco J. B.·2012·Journal of Andrology

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this study was to investigate structural changes in the penile corpus cavernosum of prepubertal chronically stressed rats. Eight Wistar rats were assigned into the stress group (SG) and were submitted to 2 hours of tube restraint daily, from the fourth to the ninth week of life. Another 7 rats were used as the control group (CG). All animals were weighed weekly. At day 64, animals were sacrificed by anesthetic overdose, blood was collected for testosterone concentration by radioimmunoassay, and penis and adrenal were collected. Adrenal mass index and testosterone serum levels were used to assess the efficacy of the stress stimulus. The surface density of connective tissue and smooth muscle fibers of corpus cavernosum were measured on Masson trichromic—stained slices. Picrosirius red—stained slices were assessed under polarized light for different types of collagen. The Student's t test was applied for mean comparisons, with P < .05 considered significant. Testosterone serum concentrations decreased and adrenal mass index increased, confirming the effectiveness of the stress protocol. Smooth muscle fibers of corpus cavernosum decreased from 14.07% (CG) to 8.98% (SG) (P = .02), and connective tissue increased from 53.66% (CG) to 64.47% (SG) (P = .01). Also, there was a higher level of type I collagen in the SG animals compared with the CG. Stress stimuli induced structural changes in the corpus cavernosum of rats suggestive of penile fibrosis, which may play a role in erection dysfunction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2164/jandrol.111.014225

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1016/j.mcna.2010.08.016 · DOI
  2. 10.1590/S0100-879X2000000900019 · DOI
  3. 10.1620/tjem.217.239 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00503-0 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/BF03035234 · DOI
  6. 10.2190/NHV6-3DYB-X51G-4BVM · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57555-4 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05917.x · DOI
  9. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1989.tb00089.x · DOI
  10. 10.2164/jandrol.109.008730 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/ijir.2009.46 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s00441-005-0006-2 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.ecl.2007.03.001 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08251.x · DOI
  15. 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900949 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/0960-0760(91)90217-S · DOI
  17. 10.1056/NEJM200006153422407 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.07.042 · DOI
  19. 10.1006/cbir.1996.0004 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/0018-506X(92)90005-G · DOI
  21. 10.1089/end.2006.0318 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67110-8 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2003.04.001 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1996.tb01755.x · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08037.x · DOI
  26. 10.2164/jandrol.108.005215 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
De Souza, D. B., Silva, D., Cortez, C. M., Costa, W. S., & Sampaio, F. J. B.
Venue
Journal of Andrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-08
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
735-739
ISSN
  • 0196-3635
  • 1939-4640
Cited by
34
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.