Cited by 53Menstrual Health and DisordersMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumTreatment of Major Depression

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: The Emerging Gold Standard?

Pearlstein, Teri·2002·Drugs

Abstract

There have been a large number of studies conducted investigating the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of patients with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). The 12 randomised, controlled trials with continuous dose administration of SSRIs and the eight randomised, controlled trials with luteal phase dose administration (from ovulation to menses) are reviewed. All the treatment studies on fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine and citalopram have reported positive efficacy. Fluoxetine and sertraline have the largest literature, with a smaller number of studies endorsing paroxetine and citalopram. Mixed efficacy results have been reported with fluvoxamine. In general, adverse effects from the use of SSRIs in women with PMDD are the usual mild and transient adverse effects from SSRIs including anxiety, dizziness, insomnia, sedation, nausea and headache. Sexual dysfunction and weight gain can be problematic long-term adverse effects of SSRIs, but these effects have not been systematically evaluated with long-term SSRI use in women with PMDD. Serotonergic antidepressants have differential superiority over nonserotonergic antidepressants in the treatment of PMDD. Treatments that enhance serotonergic action improve premenstrual irritability and dysphoria with a rapid onset of action, suggesting a different mechanism of action than in the treatment of depression. It is possible that neurosteroids, such as progesterone metabolites, are involved in the rapid action of serotonergic antidepressants in PMDD. Future research needs to address less frequent dose administration regimens, such as 'symptom-onset' dose administration, and the recommended length of treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00003495-200262130-00004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 53

Authors
Pearlstein, T.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Pearlstein, Teri
Venue
Drugs
Published
2002
Volume
62
Issue
13
Pages
1869-1885
ISSN
0012-6667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W118801846
Cited by
53
References
88
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
premenstrual dysphoric disorder, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, citalopram, fluvoxamine, adverse effects, sexual dysfunction, weight gain, neurosteroids, progesterone metabolites, rapid onset of action, antidepressant efficacy
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Premenstrual Syndrome, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review