Cited by 9Pneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsAntibiotic Use and ResistanceHealthcare cost, quality, practices

Short- vs long-course antibiotic therapy for pneumonia: a comparison of systematic reviews and guidelines for the SIMI choosing wisely campaign

Furlan, Ludovico, Erba, Luca, Trombetta, Lucia, Sacco, Roberto, Colombo, Giorgio, Casazza, Giovanni, Solbiati, Monica, Montano, Nicola +5 more·2019·Internal and Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Reduction of the inappropriate use of antibiotics in clinical practice is one of the main goals of the Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI) choosing wisely campaign. We conducted a systematic review of secondary studies (systematic reviews and guidelines) to verify what evidence is available on the duration of antibiotic treatment in Pneumonia. A literature systematic search was performed to identify all systematic reviews and the three most cited and recent guidelines that address the duration of antibiotic therapy in pneumonia. Moreover, a meta-analysis of non-duplicate data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) considered in the enrolled systematic reviews was performed together with a trial sequential analysis to identify the need for further studies. Two systematic reviews on antibiotic duration in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) for a total of 17 RCTs (2764 patients) were enrolled in our study. Meta-analysis of non-duplicate RCTs show a non-significant difference in rate of treatment failure between short (≤ 7 days) and long (> 7 days) antibiotic treatment course: RR 1.05 (95% CI, 0.82-1.36). The trial sequential analysis suggests that further data would not affect current evidence or become clinically relevant. Selected guidelines suggest consideration of a short course, with a low grade of evidence and without citing the already published systematic reviews. Antibiotic treatment of CAP for ≤ 7 days is not associated with a higher rate of treatment failure than longer courses and should thus be taken in consideration. Guidelines should upgrade the evidence on this topic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11739-018-1955-2

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Furlan, L., Erba, L., Trombetta, L., Sacco, R., Colombo, G., Casazza, G., Solbiati, M., Montano, N., Marta, C., Sbrojavacca, R., Perticone, F., Corazza, G. R., & Costantino, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • University of Udine (IT)
  • Magna Graecia University (IT)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
Corresponding author
Furlan, Ludovico
Venue
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Published
2018-10-08
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
377-394
ISSN
  • 1828-0447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1970-9366
OpenAlex
W4235904507
Cited by
9
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Internal and Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Thoracic Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
community-acquired pneumonia, antibiotic duration, short-course antibiotic therapy, Choosing Wisely, inappropriate antibiotic use, treatment failure, trial sequential analysis
MeSH terms
Antimicrobial Stewardship, Administration, Oral, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Humans, Pneumonia, Time Factors, Administration, Intravenous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review