Cited by 191Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsPharmaceutical Economics and Policy

Pharmacoeconomic Analyses Using Discrete Event Simulation

Caro, J Jaime·2005·PharmacoEconomics

Abstract

To date, decision trees and Markov models have been the most common methods used in pharmacoeconomic evaluations. Both of these techniques lack the flexibility required to appropriately represent clinical reality. In this paper an alternative, more natural, way to model clinical reality--discrete event simulation--is presented and its application is illustrated with a real world example.A discrete event simulation represents the course of disease very naturally, with few restrictions. Neither mutually exclusive branches nor states are required, nor is a fixed cycle. All relevant aspects can be incorporated explicitly and efficiently. Flexibility in handling perspectives and carrying out sensitivity analyses, including structural variations, is incorporated and the entire model can be presented very transparently. The main limitations are imposed by lack of data to fit realistic models. Discrete event simulation, though rarely employed in pharmacoeconomics today, should be strongly considered when carrying out economic evaluations, particularly those aimed at informing policy makers and at estimating the budget impact of a pharmaceutical intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00019053-200523040-00003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An STM can capture many features present in the course of a disease or clinical process, such as disease risk over time, changing states, and episodic events, although it is not the only approach that can capture these features.

    “An STM can capture many features present in the course of a disease or clinical process (e.g., disease risk over time, changing states, and episodic events), although this is not the only approach that can capture these features [13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caro, J. J.
Venue
PharmacoEconomics
Published
2005
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
323-332
ISSN
1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088512258
Cited by
191
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 20
FWCI
30.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
discrete event simulation, pharmacoeconomic evaluation, decision tree, Markov model, sensitivity analysis, structural sensitivity analysis, budget impact, pharmacological interventions, health policy
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Models, Statistical, Economics, Pharmaceutical, Models, Economic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review