Recent developments in decision-analytic modelling for economic evaluation
Abstract
The past few years have seen rapid changes in the methods of decision-analytic modelling of healthcare programmes for the purposes of economic evaluation. This paper focuses on four developments in modelling that have emerged over the past few years or have become more widely used. First, no one optimal method for extrapolating outcomes from clinical trials has yet been established. Modellers may draw from a set of varied assumptions about survival extrapolation that encompass a range of possibilities from highly optimistic to extremely cautious. Secondly, the practicality and appeal of microsimulation as a method for analysing healthcare decision problems has increased dramatically with the speed of computing technology. Individual instantiations of a system are generated by using a random process to draw from probability distributions a large number of times (also known as Monte Carlo or probabilistic simulation). Microsimulation is moving in new directions, such as discrete-event simulations that simulate sequences of events by drawing directly from probability distributions of event times; this approach is now being broadly applied to model situations where populations of patients interact with healthcare delivery systems. Microsimulation modelling of transmission systems at the population level is also rapidly developing. Thirdly, model calibration is emerging as a new tool that may offer health scientists a means of generating important fundamental knowledge about disea…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cohort and individual-based state-transition frameworks focused on in this report do not capture interactions, model a single closed cohort, and allow transitions to occur only at specified time intervals.
“These frameworks do not capture interactions, model a single (closed) cohort, and allow transitions to occur only at specified time intervals.”
From State-Transition Modeling: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-3 (2012) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
State-Transition Modeling: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-3
Siebert, U., Alagoz, O., Bayoumi, A. M., Jahn, B., Owens, D. K., Cohen, D. J., & Kuntz, K. M. (2012) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.014 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
State-Transition Modeling: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force–3
Siebert, U., Alagoz, O., Bayoumi, A. M., Jahn, B., Owens, D. K., Cohen, D. J., & Kuntz, K. M. (2012) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x12455463 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility?
Anderson, R. (2010) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1486 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
The effect of treatment as usual on major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis
Kolovos, S., van Tulder, M. W., Cuijpers, P., Prigent, A., Chevreul, K., Riper, H., & Bosmans, J. E. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.013 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
- Authors
- Weinstein, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weinstein, Milton C
- Venue
- PharmacoEconomics
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1043-1053
- ISSN
- 1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069995517
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 38.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- decision-analytic modeling, survival extrapolation, microsimulation, discrete event simulation, model calibration, transmission model, vaccination, cost-effectiveness analysis, secondary benefits, differential equation model, evidence synthesis
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Computer Simulation, Decision Making, Organizational, Decision Support Techniques, Delivery of Health Care, Disease Transmission, Infectious
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review