Cited by 37Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Pharmacotherapy for Treating Tobacco Dependence: What is the Ideal Duration of Therapy?

Sims, Tammy Harris, Fiore, Michael C.·2002·CNS Drugs

Abstract

Various forms of nicotine replacement therapy and bupropion have been found to be efficacious and well tolerated for treating patients dependent on tobacco. However, the currently recommended duration of treatment with pharmacotherapy may be insufficient for some smokers to achieve sustained abstinence from tobacco. Extending the use of pharmacotherapy beyond the recommended timeframe may be an effective strategy for helping tobacco users achieve abstinence and for preventing relapse to tobacco use, especially among those who are highly dependent and those who are concerned about bodyweight gain following cessation. Several studies have reported on long-term use of various pharmacotherapies. These studies have demonstrated that such long-term use is not harmful. Moreover, compared with continued smoking, long-term use of pharmacotherapy exposes patients to relatively small amounts of nicotine and none of the cancer-causing chemicals found in cigarettes and other tobacco products. However, more research is needed to further clarify questions regarding the ideal duration of therapy. Two questions have yet to be answered: In what populations of smokers is long-term therapy an effective strategy for achieving abstinence and preventing relapse? Does wider availability of nicotine replacement therapy lead to initiation of nicotine addiction by children and others not using tobacco products? Also, as with all medications, additional documentation of the safety of prolonged use of pharmacotherapy is important. The aim of this review is to present the current evidence supporting the notion that long-term therapy for treating tobacco dependence may be appropriately considered for some tobacco users.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00023210-200216100-00001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 37

Authors
Sims, T. H., & Fiore, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Sims, Tammy Harris
Venue
CNS Drugs
Published
2002
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
653-662
ISSN
1172-7047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026381179
Cited by
37
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CNS Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P50 CA-84724, P50CA084724)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
tobacco dependence, nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, long-term pharmacotherapy, smoking cessation, relapse prevention, nicotine abstinence, treatment duration
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Nicotine, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Time Factors, Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation, Bupropion, Nicotinic Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review